Analysis of Flangeability by Single-Stage SPIF and Press-Working in AA7075-O Sheet
Recently, the research interest of hole-flanging has turned from conventional press-working to single-point incremental forming (SPIF) as a viable process for small- and medium-sized batches. Both technologies have been studied separately using different approaches and, therefore, most studies canno...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/154354 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/154354 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047997 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Flangeability Formability Hole-flanging Limiting forming ratio Single-point incremental forming |
| Resumo: | Recently, the research interest of hole-flanging has turned from conventional press-working to single-point incremental forming (SPIF) as a viable process for small- and medium-sized batches. Both technologies have been studied separately using different approaches and, therefore, most studies cannot be easily compared. Besides, some studies that measured the formability in SPIF using the classical limiting forming ratio (LFR) showed conflicting results that still need to be clarified. Under these circumstances, the aim of this work is to provide a better understanding of the deformation process and the material formability in hole-flanging by critically comparing both forming processes. To this end, a series of experimental tests on AA7075-O sheet of 1.6-mm thickness by press-working and single-stage SPIF, using forming tools with different profile radii, are analyzed. The material formability and flange geometry are compared and discussed in detail. The process limits are analyzed by using both the Forming Limit Diagram (FLD) and the LFR. The failure modes by necking and fracture are clearly identified and assessed on both processes along with the influence of the bending induced by the tools during the flange forming. Results conclude that the LFR is not an adequate parameter to compare formability between processes other than press-working and, accordingly, two additional variables based on either the flange height or the average thickness reduction are proposed to successfully analyze flangeability. © 2021 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved. |
|---|