Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole

Aim of study: To determine the effect on wood from Pinus sylvestris of treatment with preservatives on mechanical properties and to establish the relation between the penetration and compression strenght. Area of study: Spain. Material and methods: 40 samples of defect-free wood from Pinus sylvestri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Villasante Plágaro, Antonio M., Laina, Ruben, Rojas, J. A. M., Rojas, I. M., Vignote, Santiago
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2013
País:España
Institución:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)
Repositorio:Repositori Obert UdL
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/49029
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/49029
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Light Organic Solvent Preservative
MOE
Parallel compression
id ES_3dd9bd39613775ffe88e6b37fa32cfcf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/49029
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper AzoleVillasante Plágaro, Antonio M.Laina, RubenRojas, J. A. M.Rojas, I. M.Vignote, SantiagoLight Organic Solvent PreservativeMOEParallel compressionAim of study: To determine the effect on wood from Pinus sylvestris of treatment with preservatives on mechanical properties and to establish the relation between the penetration and compression strenght. Area of study: Spain. Material and methods: 40 samples of defect-free wood from Pinus sylvestris L. were treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative (Vacsol Azure WR 2601) and 50 with waterborne Copper Azole (Tanalith E 3492). 40 control samples were not treated (water or preservative). Mechanical resistance to static bending, modulus of elasticity and compression strength parallel to the grain were compared with untreated wood. Regression analysis between the penetration and compression strength parallel was done with the samples treated with waterborne preservative. Main results: The results indicate that the treated wood (with either product) presents a statistically significant increase in mechanical resistance in all three mechanical characteristics. The results obtained differ from earlier studies carried out by other authors. There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation of the wood with waterborne Copper Azole. The most probable explanation for these results concerns changes in pressure during treatment. The use of untreated control samples instead of samples treated only with water is more likely to produce significant results in the mechanical resistance studies. Research highlights: Treated wood presents a statistically significant increase in MOE, modulus of rupture to static bending and parallel compression strength. There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation with waterborne preservative.INIA2013info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/49029reponame:Repositori Obert UdL instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)InglésReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857Forest Systems, 2013, vol. 22, núm. 3, p. 416-422(c) INIA, 2013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/490292026-06-24T12:42:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
title Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
spellingShingle Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
Villasante Plágaro, Antonio M.
Light Organic Solvent Preservative
MOE
Parallel compression
title_short Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
title_full Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
title_fullStr Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
title_sort Mechanical properties of wood from Pinus sylvestris L. treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative and with waterbone Copper Azole
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Villasante Plágaro, Antonio M.
Laina, Ruben
Rojas, J. A. M.
Rojas, I. M.
Vignote, Santiago
author Villasante Plágaro, Antonio M.
author_facet Villasante Plágaro, Antonio M.
Laina, Ruben
Rojas, J. A. M.
Rojas, I. M.
Vignote, Santiago
author_role author
author2 Laina, Ruben
Rojas, J. A. M.
Rojas, I. M.
Vignote, Santiago
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Light Organic Solvent Preservative
MOE
Parallel compression
topic Light Organic Solvent Preservative
MOE
Parallel compression
description Aim of study: To determine the effect on wood from Pinus sylvestris of treatment with preservatives on mechanical properties and to establish the relation between the penetration and compression strenght. Area of study: Spain. Material and methods: 40 samples of defect-free wood from Pinus sylvestris L. were treated with Light Organic Solvent Preservative (Vacsol Azure WR 2601) and 50 with waterborne Copper Azole (Tanalith E 3492). 40 control samples were not treated (water or preservative). Mechanical resistance to static bending, modulus of elasticity and compression strength parallel to the grain were compared with untreated wood. Regression analysis between the penetration and compression strength parallel was done with the samples treated with waterborne preservative. Main results: The results indicate that the treated wood (with either product) presents a statistically significant increase in mechanical resistance in all three mechanical characteristics. The results obtained differ from earlier studies carried out by other authors. There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation of the wood with waterborne Copper Azole. The most probable explanation for these results concerns changes in pressure during treatment. The use of untreated control samples instead of samples treated only with water is more likely to produce significant results in the mechanical resistance studies. Research highlights: Treated wood presents a statistically significant increase in MOE, modulus of rupture to static bending and parallel compression strength. There was no correlation between parallel compression strength and the degree of impregnation with waterborne preservative.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/49029
url https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/49029
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2013223-03857
Forest Systems, 2013, vol. 22, núm. 3, p. 416-422
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) INIA, 2013
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) INIA, 2013
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv INIA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv INIA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositori Obert UdL
instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)
instname_str Universitat de Lleida (UdL)
reponame_str Repositori Obert UdL
collection Repositori Obert UdL
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406473424994304
score 15,812429