The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in improving dyspnea, fatigue, physical activity, quality of life, anxiety and depression in patients with Long COVID-19 (LC). The impact of PR on LC and a comparison of face-to-face a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martínez Pozas, Oliver, Meléndez Oliva, Erika, Martínez Rolando, Lidia, Quesada Rico, José Antonio, Corbellini, Camilo, Sánchez Romero, Eleuterio
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad Europea (UEM)
Repositorio:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/12884
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12884
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:COVID-19
Disnea
Aparato respiratorio
Enfermedad
Efectos fisiológicos
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
id ES_3cc770cc8bd2365ff5fe0c472e40ddde
oai_identifier_str oai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/12884
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysisMartínez Pozas, OliverMeléndez Oliva, ErikaMartínez Rolando, LidiaQuesada Rico, José AntonioCorbellini, CamiloSánchez Romero, EleuterioCOVID-19DisneaAparato respiratorioEnfermedadEfectos fisiológicosGoal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all agesGoal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girlsObjectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in improving dyspnea, fatigue, physical activity, quality of life, anxiety and depression in patients with Long COVID-19 (LC). The impact of PR on LC and a comparison of face-to-face and telerehabilitation approaches was explored. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. A literature search included PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until January 2023. No language filters were applied. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were included. The risk of bias was assessed using appropriate tools. Descriptive analysis and meta-analysis were performed. Forest plots presented results. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Metafor Package in R v.3.4.2. Results/Findings: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 16 studies on PR in LC patients. A total of 1027 adults were included. The studies varied in design, with seven observational studies, three quasi-experimental studies, and six randomized controlled trials. Dyspnea, physical function, quality of life, psychological state, and fatigue were assessed as outcomes. The review found that pulmonary rehabilitation had a significant positive effect on dyspnea, physical function, quality of life (both global and physical domain), anxiety, and depression. However, the effect on fatigue was not significant. Heterogeneity was observed in some analyses, and publication bias was found in certain outcomes. Age and study design were identified as potential moderators. Both face-to-face and telerehabilitation interventions improved the studied outcomes, with only differences in the physical domain of quality of life favoring the face-to-face group. Implications on Physiotherapy Practice PR improved dyspnea, physical function, quality of life, and psychological state in LC patients, but not fatigue. Face-to-face and telerehabilitation have similar effects, except for physical quality of life.20242024-06-0120242024-01-0120242024-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11268/12884reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científicainstname:Universidad Europea (UEM)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:abacus.universidadeuropea.com:11268/128842026-06-11T12:41:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Martínez Pozas, Oliver
COVID-19
Disnea
Aparato respiratorio
Enfermedad
Efectos fisiológicos
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
title_short The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort The pulmonary rehabilitation effect on long covid-19 syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martínez Pozas, Oliver
Meléndez Oliva, Erika
Martínez Rolando, Lidia
Quesada Rico, José Antonio
Corbellini, Camilo
Sánchez Romero, Eleuterio
author Martínez Pozas, Oliver
author_facet Martínez Pozas, Oliver
Meléndez Oliva, Erika
Martínez Rolando, Lidia
Quesada Rico, José Antonio
Corbellini, Camilo
Sánchez Romero, Eleuterio
author_role author
author2 Meléndez Oliva, Erika
Martínez Rolando, Lidia
Quesada Rico, José Antonio
Corbellini, Camilo
Sánchez Romero, Eleuterio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COVID-19
Disnea
Aparato respiratorio
Enfermedad
Efectos fisiológicos
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
topic COVID-19
Disnea
Aparato respiratorio
Enfermedad
Efectos fisiológicos
Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
description Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in improving dyspnea, fatigue, physical activity, quality of life, anxiety and depression in patients with Long COVID-19 (LC). The impact of PR on LC and a comparison of face-to-face and telerehabilitation approaches was explored. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. A literature search included PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until January 2023. No language filters were applied. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies were included. The risk of bias was assessed using appropriate tools. Descriptive analysis and meta-analysis were performed. Forest plots presented results. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Metafor Package in R v.3.4.2. Results/Findings: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 16 studies on PR in LC patients. A total of 1027 adults were included. The studies varied in design, with seven observational studies, three quasi-experimental studies, and six randomized controlled trials. Dyspnea, physical function, quality of life, psychological state, and fatigue were assessed as outcomes. The review found that pulmonary rehabilitation had a significant positive effect on dyspnea, physical function, quality of life (both global and physical domain), anxiety, and depression. However, the effect on fatigue was not significant. Heterogeneity was observed in some analyses, and publication bias was found in certain outcomes. Age and study design were identified as potential moderators. Both face-to-face and telerehabilitation interventions improved the studied outcomes, with only differences in the physical domain of quality of life favoring the face-to-face group. Implications on Physiotherapy Practice PR improved dyspnea, physical function, quality of life, and psychological state in LC patients, but not fatigue. Face-to-face and telerehabilitation have similar effects, except for physical quality of life.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2024-06-01
2024
2024-01-01
2024
2024-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12884
url http://hdl.handle.net/11268/12884
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
instname:Universidad Europea (UEM)
instname_str Universidad Europea (UEM)
reponame_str ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
collection ABACUS. Repositorio de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406397798547456
score 15.300724

Similares en LA Referencia