Concurrent validity and agreement of the HerniaCare Lab device for abdominal wall strength assessment

Purpose: Currently, no standardized, low-cost, and portable method is available for assessing abdominal wall strength in patients with incisional hernias, addressing the limitations of traditional dynamometry. Methods: This cross-sectional validation study compared the HerniaCare Lab device performa...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Gil Delgado, José Luis, Rangel Cascajosa, Carlos, Sánchez Arteaga, Alejandro, Tallón Aguilar, Luis, Sañudo Corrales, Borja
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2026
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositório:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:idus________::b1230f8c3b33c2b6459e87a28bf54c3f
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/186123
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03580-9
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Abdominal wall hernia
Muscle strength assessment
Device validation
Hand-held dynamometry
Descrição
Resumo:Purpose: Currently, no standardized, low-cost, and portable method is available for assessing abdominal wall strength in patients with incisional hernias, addressing the limitations of traditional dynamometry. Methods: This cross-sectional validation study compared the HerniaCare Lab device performance with the Activforce 2 hand-held dynamometer in92 adults diagnosed with abdominal wall hernias. Isometric trunk flexion strength was measured under identical conditions, and agreement between devices was analyzed using non-parametric tests, correlation, and concordance statistics. Results: The HerniaCare Lab showed systematically higher strength values than the Activforce 2 (mean difference = + 22.3 N, p < 0.001) but demonstrated a very strong positive correlation (ρ = 0.95, p < 0.001) and good concordance (CCC = 0.89). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of + 24.9 N with 95% limits of agreement from − 17.7 to+ 67.5 N, and a slight proportional bias at higher force levels. Conclusion: Despite predictable overestimation, the HerniaCare Lab exhibits strong concurrent validity and good agreement with an established reference device, supporting its potential clinical utility for objective, reproducible, and accessible assessment of abdominal wall strength in surgical populations.