Pension systems compared

Globalisation and international competition have a spillover effect on the reforms of pension systems that imposes a similar pattern of dismantling, hardening access to pensions, reducing expenditure and retrenchment in said reforms. The comparative analysis of four countries with different pension...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Scarponetti, Patricia, Sepúlveda, Leandro, Martin, Antonio|||0000-0002-8225-1860
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:233914
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/233914
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48442-2_14
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Pensions
Occupational pensions
Reform policies
Globalisation
Social dialogue
Neoliberalism
Corporatism
Descripción
Sumario:Globalisation and international competition have a spillover effect on the reforms of pension systems that imposes a similar pattern of dismantling, hardening access to pensions, reducing expenditure and retrenchment in said reforms. The comparative analysis of four countries with different pension systems: two liberal (United Kingdom and Chile) and another two with contributory-proportional systems (Spain and Argentina) serves to determine the details of the reform processes, which discursively seem to have a shared pattern recommended by the international financial and economic institutions. But the reality of the four case studies shows considerable differences in the implementation of the pension reform policies. The reforms depend on the societal context, institutions, history, the role of unions, the government in power, demographic factors and economic perspectives, among other matters. Many countries need to sustain pension systems because they are associated with many pensioners' political vote. Therefore, the spillover effect of globalisation and the convergence in certain uniform patterns of reforms is far from reality in the four countries, and as such, the measures adopted are specific for each country.