Reply to Janssen, H. Comment on “Cabrera et al. A User-Friendly Tool to Characterize the Moisture Transfer in Porous Building Materials: FLoW1D. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5090”
A significant part of the critical comments by Prof. Janssen, in relation to the work presented in, are based on an assessment of statements that are not really made in the latter work. As it is scientifically inconsistent to discuss issues that one has not stated, the present reply is based on anal...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo General de la Arquitectura Técnica de España (CGATE) |
| Repositorio: | RIARTE |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.riarte.es:20.500.12251/2827 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/2827 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85123207676&doi=10.3390%2fapp12031124&partnerID=40&md5=aecc2553c7828d90593bd33eaa5196f8 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Material de construcción Porosidad Ensayos (propiedades o materiales) 3313.04 Material de Construcción 3312.08 Propiedades de Los Materiales 3312.12 Ensayo de Materiales |
| Sumario: | A significant part of the critical comments by Prof. Janssen, in relation to the work presented in, are based on an assessment of statements that are not really made in the latter work. As it is scientifically inconsistent to discuss issues that one has not stated, the present reply is based on analysing the only three issues raised by Prof. Janssen that are very critical to: the scope of the van Genuchten–Mualem model, the capabilities of FloW1D, and the validity of the parameter estimations presented in. |
|---|