Evaluating an AI-Powered Moodle Plugin for Enhancing Conceptual Understanding in Secondary Physics
This pilot study explores the feasibility of integrating large language model (LLM) assistants into physics education through a Moodle plugin designed to address conceptual understanding in Newtonian mechanics. Using OpenAI's GPT for real-time Socratic dialogue, the plugin guides students throu...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:uabarcelona_::b7edb3139fef2fe75718abb9194fbc7e |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/327974 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3991/ijet.v20i04.57879 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Large Language Models Force Concept Inventory Learning Management System Conceptual change Physics misconceptions Socratic dialogue AI Moodle Plugin Artificial Intelligence in STEM education Constructivist learning |
| Sumario: | This pilot study explores the feasibility of integrating large language model (LLM) assistants into physics education through a Moodle plugin designed to address conceptual understanding in Newtonian mechanics. Using OpenAI's GPT for real-time Socratic dialogue, the plugin guides students through misconception-targeted questions adapted from the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). Aligned with principles of inquiry-based learning, the intervention compares AI-guided feedback with instructor-guided materials over a one-week, three-session classroom study. Results suggest that students receiving AI-guided Socratic dialogue showed greater conceptual gains on certain targeted items (e.g., Newton's Third Law), whereas instructor guidance proved more effective for other concepts (e.g., mass and free-fall independence). Survey feedback highlights the immediacy and interactive nature of the AI while also noting a preference for the clarity provided by instructors. Qualitative analysis of open-ended question responses suggests that AI-driven dialogue promotes deeper reasoning when restating student ideas and scaffolding reflection. These preliminary findings underscore the potential of LLMs to support conceptual change in physics education when thoughtfully embedded within learning management systems, highlighting the complexity and value of personalized, interactive feedback for addressing student misconceptions. |
|---|