Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España

[EN] Objective: The number of older people with functional or other problems that prevent them from going out of doors is unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of homebound status in Spain and to determine their main characteristics. Material and methods: The Classifica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Ayala García, Alba, Pujol, Rogelio, Abellán García, Antonio
Format: article
Status:Versión aceptada para publicación
Publication Date:2018
Country:España
Institution:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repository:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/196211
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/196211
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Homebound
Disability
Prevalence
Older people
Vulnerability
International Classification of Functioning
Confinamiento
Discapacidad
Prevalencia
Personas mayores
Vulnerabilidad
Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento
id ES_3a849c98b7d3fa2f7b08a87d436ca3fc
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/196211
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
title Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
spellingShingle Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
Ayala García, Alba
Homebound
Disability
Prevalence
Older people
Vulnerability
International Classification of Functioning
Confinamiento
Discapacidad
Prevalencia
Personas mayores
Vulnerabilidad
Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento
title_short Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
title_full Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
title_fullStr Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
title_full_unstemmed Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
title_sort Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en España
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ayala García, Alba
Pujol, Rogelio
Abellán García, Antonio
author Ayala García, Alba
author_facet Ayala García, Alba
Pujol, Rogelio
Abellán García, Antonio
author_role author
author2 Pujol, Rogelio
Abellán García, Antonio
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Homebound
Disability
Prevalence
Older people
Vulnerability
International Classification of Functioning
Confinamiento
Discapacidad
Prevalencia
Personas mayores
Vulnerabilidad
Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento
topic Homebound
Disability
Prevalence
Older people
Vulnerability
International Classification of Functioning
Confinamiento
Discapacidad
Prevalencia
Personas mayores
Vulnerabilidad
Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento
description [EN] Objective: The number of older people with functional or other problems that prevent them from going out of doors is unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of homebound status in Spain and to determine their main characteristics. Material and methods: The Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health was used. Homebound status was defined according to the declared difficulty with regard to mobility outside the home: completely homebound (not able to leave home), semi-homebound (have serious difficulties but can leave with help), and the individuals without problems that were not homebound. Capacity and performance qualifiers were used to assess the final impact of technical or personal help. Prevalences were calculated, and sociodemographic and health characteristics were compared for the different groups. Results: Out of a total of 2,146,362 older people with disabilities, 8.1% (95% CI: 8.1-8.2) and 16.0% (95% CI: 15.9-16.0) were (complete) homebound, and semi-homebound, respectively. The homebound elderly were mostly women, had a higher mean age and low education level. They also declared they had more difficulty for the environmental barriers, had worse perceived health, a greater number of disabilities, chronic health conditions, and more functional problems. Conclusions: The prevalence of older disabled people with a homebound status was 24.1%. The social, health, and functional characteristics suggest situations of vulnerability. The information on homebound individuals could contribute to enhance social and health plans, and to raise the visibility of this problem.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2019
2019
2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Postprint
Postprint
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/196211
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/196211
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Español
language_invalid_str_mv Español
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CSO2015-64115-R
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2018.07.001
Sí
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406241129758720
spelling Prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar en EspañaAyala García, AlbaPujol, RogelioAbellán García, AntonioHomeboundDisabilityPrevalenceOlder peopleVulnerabilityInternational Classification of FunctioningConfinamientoDiscapacidadPrevalenciaPersonas mayoresVulnerabilidadClasificación internacional del funcionamiento[EN] Objective: The number of older people with functional or other problems that prevent them from going out of doors is unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of homebound status in Spain and to determine their main characteristics. Material and methods: The Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health was used. Homebound status was defined according to the declared difficulty with regard to mobility outside the home: completely homebound (not able to leave home), semi-homebound (have serious difficulties but can leave with help), and the individuals without problems that were not homebound. Capacity and performance qualifiers were used to assess the final impact of technical or personal help. Prevalences were calculated, and sociodemographic and health characteristics were compared for the different groups. Results: Out of a total of 2,146,362 older people with disabilities, 8.1% (95% CI: 8.1-8.2) and 16.0% (95% CI: 15.9-16.0) were (complete) homebound, and semi-homebound, respectively. The homebound elderly were mostly women, had a higher mean age and low education level. They also declared they had more difficulty for the environmental barriers, had worse perceived health, a greater number of disabilities, chronic health conditions, and more functional problems. Conclusions: The prevalence of older disabled people with a homebound status was 24.1%. The social, health, and functional characteristics suggest situations of vulnerability. The information on homebound individuals could contribute to enhance social and health plans, and to raise the visibility of this problem.[ES] Objetivo Se desconoce el número de personas mayores que viven confinadas en su hogar debido a problemas funcionales o de otra naturaleza. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar su prevalencia en España y conocer sus principales características.Material y métodos Se utilizó la Encuesta de Discapacidad, Autonomía Personal y Situaciones de Dependencia. Se definió el confinamiento a partir de la dificultad declarada para movilidad fuera del hogar: personas confinadas en sentido estricto (no pueden salir nunca), semiconfinadas (pueden salir con ayuda pero con serias dificultades) y el resto fueron no confinadas. Se utilizaron los calificadores de capacidad y desempeño para evaluar el efecto final de la prestación de ayuda técnica o personal. Se calcularon prevalencias y se compararon características sociodemográficas y de salud. Resultados Sobre un total de 2.146.362 de personas mayores con discapacidad, el 8,1% (IC 95%: 8,1-8,2) resultó población confinada en sentido estricto y un 16,0% (IC 95%: 15,9-16,0) semiconfinada. Las personas mayores confinadas eran sobre todo mujeres, tenían una mayor edad media y un nivel bajo de estudios; declararon más dificultades ante las barreras del entorno; presentaron peor salud percibida, mayor número discapacidades, condiciones crónicas de salud y más problemas funcionales.Conclusiones La prevalencia de personas mayores confinadas en su hogar, entre todas las que se encuentran en situación de discapacidad, alcanzó el 24,1%. Sus características sociales, de salud y funcionales indican situaciones de vulnerabilidad. La información sobre confinamiento puede contribuir a la mejora de los planes de actuación social o de salud y facilita la visibilidad de este problema.Peer ReviewedElsevierMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]2019201920182019info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501PostprintPostprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/196211reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Español#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/CSO2015-64115-Rhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2018.07.001Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/1962112026-05-22T06:33:51Z
score 15.812429

Similar Items