Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.

In this experimental in vitro study, both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of two self-curing dental composites were compared: Structur 3 (based on Bis-GMA) and Visco III (based on Bis-EMA), which are used for the direct fabrication of temporary dental prostheses. The properties evaluat...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Valencia Blanco OJ, Fernández-Hernández S, de Llanos-Lanchares H, Punset Fuste M, Delgado García-Menocal JA, Gil Mur J, Brizuela Velasco A
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Recursos:Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
Repositorio:r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
OAI Identifier:oai:fsjd.fundanetsuite.com:p29157
Acesso em linha:https://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=29157
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Bis-EMA
Bis-GMA
flexural resistance
microhardness
scratch resistance
temporary provisional prosthesis
water absorption
wear rate
id ES_398e811bd27abc970c2dc2974802cd72
oai_identifier_str oai:fsjd.fundanetsuite.com:p29157
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.Valencia Blanco OJFernández-Hernández Sde Llanos-Lanchares HPunset Fuste MDelgado García-Menocal JAGil Mur JBrizuela Velasco ABis-EMABis-GMAflexural resistancemicrohardnessscratch resistancetemporary provisional prosthesiswater absorptionwear rateIn this experimental in vitro study, both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of two self-curing dental composites were compared: Structur 3 (based on Bis-GMA) and Visco III (based on Bis-EMA), which are used for the direct fabrication of temporary dental prostheses. The properties evaluated included flexural strength, toughness, hydrophilicity (measured using the contact angle), density, microhardness, water absorption, and wear and scratch resistance. In terms of flexural strength, Structur 3 exhibited a higher value (127 ± 16 MPa) than Visco III (103 ± 25 MPa). In addition, the dental composite based on Bis-GMA showed a higher toughness (36.52 ± 9.20 mJ) compared to 16.55 ± 7.55 mJ for the dental composite based on Bis-EMA) and a greater displacement to fracture (2.50 ± 0.38 mm compared to 1.72 ± 0.38 mm). However, Visco III showed a higher microhardness (17.045 ± 0.93 HV0.5) compared to Structur 3 (8.10 ± 0.76 HV0.5) and a lower water absorption (11.2 ± 0.4 µg/mm(3) compared to Structur 3). In wear tests, Structur 3 showed greater wear (0.047 ± 0.021 mm(2) wear channel area) compared to Visco III (0.031 ± 0.013 mm(2)). Density analysis showed that Visco III is denser (1.5917 ± 0.006 g/cm(3)) than Structur 3 (1.324 ± 0.005 g/cm(3)). Fractography analysis showed that both dental composites exhibited brittle fractures. Contact angle tests revealed a similar hydrophilicity of both dental composites with values below 90°. These differences in properties may be influenced by the filler composition of the two dental composites, as Visco III contains macro-fillers with elements such as aluminum and barium, which increase radiopacity. The conclusion is that Visco III is preferable in terms of durability and resistance, while Structur 3 is more suitable for applications that require flexibility, such as in provisional prostheses with pontics or in situations that require high esthetic quality.MDPI2025info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=29157Bioengineering-BaselISSN: 23065354reponame:r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déuinstname:Fundació Sant Joan de DéuInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:fsjd.fundanetsuite.com:p291572026-05-27T12:37:41Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
title Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
spellingShingle Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
Valencia Blanco OJ
Bis-EMA
Bis-GMA
flexural resistance
microhardness
scratch resistance
temporary provisional prosthesis
water absorption
wear rate
title_short Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
title_full Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
title_fullStr Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
title_full_unstemmed Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
title_sort Physicochemical and Mechanical Characterization of Two Self-Curing Composite Resins for Direct Provisional Prostheses.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Valencia Blanco OJ
Fernández-Hernández S
de Llanos-Lanchares H
Punset Fuste M
Delgado García-Menocal JA
Gil Mur J
Brizuela Velasco A
author Valencia Blanco OJ
author_facet Valencia Blanco OJ
Fernández-Hernández S
de Llanos-Lanchares H
Punset Fuste M
Delgado García-Menocal JA
Gil Mur J
Brizuela Velasco A
author_role author
author2 Fernández-Hernández S
de Llanos-Lanchares H
Punset Fuste M
Delgado García-Menocal JA
Gil Mur J
Brizuela Velasco A
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bis-EMA
Bis-GMA
flexural resistance
microhardness
scratch resistance
temporary provisional prosthesis
water absorption
wear rate
topic Bis-EMA
Bis-GMA
flexural resistance
microhardness
scratch resistance
temporary provisional prosthesis
water absorption
wear rate
description In this experimental in vitro study, both the physicochemical and mechanical properties of two self-curing dental composites were compared: Structur 3 (based on Bis-GMA) and Visco III (based on Bis-EMA), which are used for the direct fabrication of temporary dental prostheses. The properties evaluated included flexural strength, toughness, hydrophilicity (measured using the contact angle), density, microhardness, water absorption, and wear and scratch resistance. In terms of flexural strength, Structur 3 exhibited a higher value (127 ± 16 MPa) than Visco III (103 ± 25 MPa). In addition, the dental composite based on Bis-GMA showed a higher toughness (36.52 ± 9.20 mJ) compared to 16.55 ± 7.55 mJ for the dental composite based on Bis-EMA) and a greater displacement to fracture (2.50 ± 0.38 mm compared to 1.72 ± 0.38 mm). However, Visco III showed a higher microhardness (17.045 ± 0.93 HV0.5) compared to Structur 3 (8.10 ± 0.76 HV0.5) and a lower water absorption (11.2 ± 0.4 µg/mm(3) compared to Structur 3). In wear tests, Structur 3 showed greater wear (0.047 ± 0.021 mm(2) wear channel area) compared to Visco III (0.031 ± 0.013 mm(2)). Density analysis showed that Visco III is denser (1.5917 ± 0.006 g/cm(3)) than Structur 3 (1.324 ± 0.005 g/cm(3)). Fractography analysis showed that both dental composites exhibited brittle fractures. Contact angle tests revealed a similar hydrophilicity of both dental composites with values below 90°. These differences in properties may be influenced by the filler composition of the two dental composites, as Visco III contains macro-fillers with elements such as aluminum and barium, which increase radiopacity. The conclusion is that Visco III is preferable in terms of durability and resistance, while Structur 3 is more suitable for applications that require flexibility, such as in provisional prostheses with pontics or in situations that require high esthetic quality.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=29157
url https://fsjd.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=29157
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Bioengineering-Basel
ISSN: 23065354
reponame:r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
instname:Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
instname_str Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
reponame_str r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
collection r-FSJD. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de la Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406171455029248
score 15,812429