Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis

The energy production from biomass through thermochemical processes is a promising technology to reduce the negative environmental impact. This study evaluates the environmental effects of the use of different Mexican biomasses (castor husk, coffee pulp and Pinus sawdust) on the combustion and gasif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Parascanu, M. M., Puig-Gamero, M., Soreanu, G., Valverde, J. L., Sanchez-Silva, L.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:TECNALIA Research & Innovation
Repositorio:TECNALIA Publications
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dsp.tecnalia.com:11556/5231
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11556/5231
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Biomass
Combustion
Economic analysis
Energy
Gasification
Life cycle assessment
Civil and Structural Engineering
Building and Construction
Modeling and Simulation
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fuel Technology
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Pollution
General Energy
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
id ES_38bf7eaa22995747ebd476db8a01fc9d
oai_identifier_str oai:dsp.tecnalia.com:11556/5231
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysisParascanu, M. M.Puig-Gamero, M.Soreanu, G.Valverde, J. L.Sanchez-Silva, L.BiomassCombustionEconomic analysisEnergyGasificationLife cycle assessmentCivil and Structural EngineeringBuilding and ConstructionModeling and SimulationRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentFuel TechnologyEnergy Engineering and Power TechnologyPollutionGeneral EnergyMechanical EngineeringIndustrial and Manufacturing EngineeringManagement, Monitoring, Policy and LawElectrical and Electronic EngineeringSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean EnergySDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and ProductionSDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic GrowthSDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and InfrastructureThe energy production from biomass through thermochemical processes is a promising technology to reduce the negative environmental impact. This study evaluates the environmental effects of the use of different Mexican biomasses (castor husk, coffee pulp and Pinus sawdust) on the combustion and gasification processes applied to energy production. The objective was to carry out the environmental and economic analysis associated with the generation of 1 MJ of energy for three proposals to determine which biomass is better to use as a raw material, which process is more respectful with the environment and economically viable. The life cycle assessment analysis showed that the combustion process is less harmful to the environment than the gasification process. In addition, for the two thermochemical processes studied, it was observed that the equipment that most damaged the environment was the Rankine cycle due to the emissions released and the energy consumed. Therefore, the coffee pulp was identified as the biomass with the most negative impact for both processes and the Pinus sawdust as the one that least affects the environment. The energy production through combustion process is more economically viable than the gasification, but both processes can be considered highly competitive for the biomass valorization.ECONOMÍA CIRCULAR20242024-09-1320192019-12-1520192019-12-15journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/11556/5231reponame:TECNALIA Publicationsinstname:TECNALIA Research & InnovationInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dsp.tecnalia.com:11556/52312026-06-12T12:42:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
title Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
spellingShingle Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
Parascanu, M. M.
Biomass
Combustion
Economic analysis
Energy
Gasification
Life cycle assessment
Civil and Structural Engineering
Building and Construction
Modeling and Simulation
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fuel Technology
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Pollution
General Energy
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
title_short Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
title_full Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
title_sort Comparison of three Mexican biomasses valorization through combustion and gasification: Environmental and economic analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Parascanu, M. M.
Puig-Gamero, M.
Soreanu, G.
Valverde, J. L.
Sanchez-Silva, L.
author Parascanu, M. M.
author_facet Parascanu, M. M.
Puig-Gamero, M.
Soreanu, G.
Valverde, J. L.
Sanchez-Silva, L.
author_role author
author2 Puig-Gamero, M.
Soreanu, G.
Valverde, J. L.
Sanchez-Silva, L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv ECONOMÍA CIRCULAR
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biomass
Combustion
Economic analysis
Energy
Gasification
Life cycle assessment
Civil and Structural Engineering
Building and Construction
Modeling and Simulation
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fuel Technology
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Pollution
General Energy
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
topic Biomass
Combustion
Economic analysis
Energy
Gasification
Life cycle assessment
Civil and Structural Engineering
Building and Construction
Modeling and Simulation
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Fuel Technology
Energy Engineering and Power Technology
Pollution
General Energy
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
description The energy production from biomass through thermochemical processes is a promising technology to reduce the negative environmental impact. This study evaluates the environmental effects of the use of different Mexican biomasses (castor husk, coffee pulp and Pinus sawdust) on the combustion and gasification processes applied to energy production. The objective was to carry out the environmental and economic analysis associated with the generation of 1 MJ of energy for three proposals to determine which biomass is better to use as a raw material, which process is more respectful with the environment and economically viable. The life cycle assessment analysis showed that the combustion process is less harmful to the environment than the gasification process. In addition, for the two thermochemical processes studied, it was observed that the equipment that most damaged the environment was the Rankine cycle due to the emissions released and the energy consumed. Therefore, the coffee pulp was identified as the biomass with the most negative impact for both processes and the Pinus sawdust as the one that least affects the environment. The energy production through combustion process is more economically viable than the gasification, but both processes can be considered highly competitive for the biomass valorization.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-12-15
2019
2019-12-15
2024
2024-09-13
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11556/5231
url https://hdl.handle.net/11556/5231
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:TECNALIA Publications
instname:TECNALIA Research & Innovation
instname_str TECNALIA Research & Innovation
reponame_str TECNALIA Publications
collection TECNALIA Publications
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406121795518465
score 15,81155

Similares en LA Referencia