Understanding socioecological interaction networks in Marine Protected Areas to inform management

The concept of ecosystem services has become increasingly important in understanding the interactions between humans and nature and the associated implications in terms of human well-being. Despite growing interest in ecosystem services research, knowledge of their ecological underpinnings and their...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Juan, Silvia de, Ospina Álvarez, Andrés, Castro, Antonio J., Fernández, Emilio, Méndez Martínez, Gonzalo, Molina, Jone, Pita Orduna, Pablo, Ruiz Frau, Ana, Abreu, Gabriela de, Villasante Larramendi, Carlos Sebastián
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2023
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
Repositório:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/42241
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10347/42241
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Coastal habitats
Ecosystem functions
Ecosystems services
Social actors
Coastal management
Descrição
Resumo:The concept of ecosystem services has become increasingly important in understanding the interactions between humans and nature and the associated implications in terms of human well-being. Despite growing interest in ecosystem services research, knowledge of their ecological underpinnings and their integration with socioeconomic and management components remains limited. In this study, we propose a multi-layered network approach to assess the connection between ecological components, ecosystem functions and societal uses and benefits, management actions, and global change impacts in four Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in Spain. An interaction matrix between all relevant components in the MPAs was built based on scientific knowledge, published records, and validated in stakeholder workshops. Then, we applied network analysis to explore the emergent properties of the network of connected elements in the MPAs. For example, habitat foundation species, such as kelp or seagrasses, were central to the networks and concentrated most connections with other ecological, social, and management components. The positive-negative index showed that human activities often had negative indices, ecological components had positive indices, and management, mitigation action, and infrastructure had variable effects across MPAs. Betweenness identified the foundation species or the scientific community as playing a key role in facilitating connections across the network in MPAs. This research provides valuable insights into the complex interactions between ecosystems, human activities, ecosystem functions and services, and management opportunities for coastal MPAs, with important consequences for the local management of the areas.