One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays

To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the ot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Souza, Joana, Fuentes, Maria Victoria, Baena, Eugenia, Ceballos, Laura
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Repositorio:BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:burjcdigital::52e4b93802fa489036ee4b5750fc917f
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28713
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Odontología
onlay
CAD/CAM
Resin composite blocks
Lithium disilicate
clinical performance
id ES_37f299b7a493e3180105cc6f1c351364
oai_identifier_str oai:dnet:burjcdigital::52e4b93802fa489036ee4b5750fc917f
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlaysSouza, JoanaFuentes, Maria VictoriaBaena, EugeniaCeballos, LauraOdontologíaonlayCAD/CAMResin composite blocksLithium disilicateclinical performanceTo compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other with Lava Ultimate (3M Oral Care). Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at baseline and 1 year after the onlays were cemented, according to FDI criteria. At each recall, digital photographs, bite-wing radiographs and impressions of the restorations were taken for SEM evaluation of the interface. Results were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). At baseline and in the 1-year recall, both CAD/CAM materials exhibited excellent results in most criteria with similar esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). However, deterioration in surface lustre (p = 0.020) and color match/translucency (p = 0.039) were detected for IPS e.max CAD onlays after 1-year. Under SEM evaluation, there were no statistically differences in micromorphological criteria at baseline nor after a year between IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays. Conclusion: After 1 year of clinical service IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays showed a similar clinical performance that needs to be confirmed in long-term evaluations.Springer202420242020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/28713reponame:BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlosinstname:Universidad Rey Juan CarlosInglésAttribution 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dnet:burjcdigital::52e4b93802fa489036ee4b5750fc917f2025-07-24T13:39:12Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
spellingShingle One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
Souza, Joana
Odontología
onlay
CAD/CAM
Resin composite blocks
Lithium disilicate
clinical performance
title_short One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_full One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_fullStr One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_full_unstemmed One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
title_sort One-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate versus resin composite CAD/CAM onlays
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Souza, Joana
Fuentes, Maria Victoria
Baena, Eugenia
Ceballos, Laura
author Souza, Joana
author_facet Souza, Joana
Fuentes, Maria Victoria
Baena, Eugenia
Ceballos, Laura
author_role author
author2 Fuentes, Maria Victoria
Baena, Eugenia
Ceballos, Laura
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Odontología
onlay
CAD/CAM
Resin composite blocks
Lithium disilicate
clinical performance
topic Odontología
onlay
CAD/CAM
Resin composite blocks
Lithium disilicate
clinical performance
description To compare the 1-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate and resin composite CAD/CAM onlay restorations. Twenty patients that required two restorations in posterior teeth, with at least one cusp to be covered, received two onlays. One was made with IPS e.max CAD (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and the other with Lava Ultimate (3M Oral Care). Two blind observers evaluated the restorations at baseline and 1 year after the onlays were cemented, according to FDI criteria. At each recall, digital photographs, bite-wing radiographs and impressions of the restorations were taken for SEM evaluation of the interface. Results were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon tests (p < 0.05). At baseline and in the 1-year recall, both CAD/CAM materials exhibited excellent results in most criteria with similar esthetic, functional and biological properties (p > 0.05). However, deterioration in surface lustre (p = 0.020) and color match/translucency (p = 0.039) were detected for IPS e.max CAD onlays after 1-year. Under SEM evaluation, there were no statistically differences in micromorphological criteria at baseline nor after a year between IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays. Conclusion: After 1 year of clinical service IPS e.max CAD and Lava Ultimate onlays showed a similar clinical performance that needs to be confirmed in long-term evaluations.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28713
url https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28713
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
instname:Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
instname_str Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
reponame_str BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
collection BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844182343402651648
score 15,638193

Similares en LA Referencia