Carbapenem alternatives for treatment of bloodstream infections due to AmpC producing enterobacterales

Introduction: Carbapenems (CR) have traditionally been the first line treatment for bacteremia caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. However, CR have a high ecological impact, and carbapenem-resistant strains continue rising. Thus, other treatment alternatives like Piperacillin-Tazobactam (P-T)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Ávila Núñez, Marina, Lima Rodriguez, Olalla, Sousa Dominguez, Adrián, Represa Montenegro, Marta, Rubiñan Iglesias, Pablo, Celestino, P., Garrido Ventin, Martin, García Formoso, Lia, Vasallo Vidal, Francisco José, Martínez Lamas, Lucía, Perez Landeiro, Antonio, Rubianes Gonzalez, Martin, Perez Rodriguez, Maria Teresa
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Servizo Galego de Saúde (SERGAS)
Repositorio:RUNA. Repositorio da Consellería de Sanidade e Sergas
OAI Identifier:oai:runa.sergas.gal:20.500.11940/21180
Acceso en línea:https://portalcientifico.sergas.gal//documentos/64f6355866ccc641d10d6bab
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11940/21180
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Adult
Humans
Aged
Retrospective Studies
Sepsis
Cefepime
Bacteremia
Carbapenems
Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination
AS Vigo
CHUVI
AS Santiago
IDIS
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: Carbapenems (CR) have traditionally been the first line treatment for bacteremia caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. However, CR have a high ecological impact, and carbapenem-resistant strains continue rising. Thus, other treatment alternatives like Piperacillin-Tazobactam (P-T) or Cefepime (CEF) and oral sequential therapy (OST) are being evaluated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre observational study. All adult patients with AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia were included. The primary endpoint was clinical success defined as a composite of clinical cure, 14-day survival, and no adverse events. We evaluated the evolution of patients in whom OST was performed. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included, 22 patients in the CR group and 55 in the P-T/CEF group (37 patients received CEF and 18 P-T). The mean age of the patients was higher in the P-T/CEF group (71 years in CR group vs. 76 years in P-T/CEF group, p = 0.053). In the multivariate analysis, age ? 70 years (OR 0.08, 95% CI [0.007-0.966], p = 0.047) and a Charlson index ? 3 (OR 0.16, 95% CI [0.026-0.984], p = 0.048), were associated with a lower clinical success. Treatment with P-T/CEF was associated with higher clinical success (OR 7.75, 95% CI [1.273-47.223], p = 0.026). OST was performed in 47% of patients. This was related with a shorter in-hospital stay (OST 14 days [7-22] vs. non-OST 18 days [13-38], p = 0.005) without difference in recurrence (OST 3% vs. non-OST 5%, p = 0.999). Conclusions: Targeted treatment with P-T/CEF and OST could be safe and effective treatments for patients with AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia.