Is it possible the agreement between Bayesian Theory and Fuzzy Sets?
Everybody in the fuzzy field knows about the controversy between Prob-ability and Fuzziness. Some articles are still published from time to time, dicusssing conceptual diiferences and showing comparative analyses or collaborative approaches. In this paper we point out what we think is the main issue,...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | capítulo de libro |
| Fecha de publicación: | 1997 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/60885 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/60885 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 510.64 Lógica simbólica y matemática (Matemáticas) 1102.14 Lógica Simbólica |
| Sumario: | Everybody in the fuzzy field knows about the controversy between Prob-ability and Fuzziness. Some articles are still published from time to time, dicusssing conceptual diiferences and showing comparative analyses or collaborative approaches. In this paper we point out what we think is the main issue, sometimes made obscure because of accompanying complains: a pure Bayesian does not accept the idea of modeling other thing different than acts, which are always crisp. Key words: Fuzzy Sets Theory, Decision |
|---|