Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice

Background/Objective: This study sought to assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in patients with resected, non-metastatic cancer and eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. Method: A total of 568 patients were recruited from a multi-institutiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Calderón, Caterina, Jiménez-Fonseca, Paula, Ferrando, Pere Joan, Jara, Carlos, Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano, Beato, Carmen, García-García, Teresa, Castelo Fernández, Beatriz, Ramchandani, Avinash, Muñoz, María Mar, Martínez de Castro, Eva, Ghanem, Ismael, Mangas, Montse, Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Repositorio:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/681681
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10486/681681
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.12.001
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Cancer
Instrumental study
Patient perspective
Patient-physician relationship
Shared decision-making
Medicina
id ES_35f9c9b52f207db0693fc17fb53729aa
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/681681
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
Propiedades psicométricas del Questionnaire Shared Decision-Making (SDM-Q-9) en oncología
title Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
spellingShingle Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
Calderón, Caterina
Cancer
Instrumental study
Patient perspective
Patient-physician relationship
Shared decision-making
Medicina
title_short Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
title_full Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
title_sort Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practice
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Calderón, Caterina
Jiménez-Fonseca, Paula
Ferrando, Pere Joan
Jara, Carlos
Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano
Beato, Carmen
García-García, Teresa
Castelo Fernández, Beatriz
Ramchandani, Avinash
Muñoz, María Mar
Martínez de Castro, Eva
Ghanem, Ismael
Mangas, Montse
Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto
author Calderón, Caterina
author_facet Calderón, Caterina
Jiménez-Fonseca, Paula
Ferrando, Pere Joan
Jara, Carlos
Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano
Beato, Carmen
García-García, Teresa
Castelo Fernández, Beatriz
Ramchandani, Avinash
Muñoz, María Mar
Martínez de Castro, Eva
Ghanem, Ismael
Mangas, Montse
Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto
author_role author
author2 Jiménez-Fonseca, Paula
Ferrando, Pere Joan
Jara, Carlos
Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano
Beato, Carmen
García-García, Teresa
Castelo Fernández, Beatriz
Ramchandani, Avinash
Muñoz, María Mar
Martínez de Castro, Eva
Ghanem, Ismael
Mangas, Montse
Carmona-Bayonas, Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Medicina
Facultad de Medicina
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario de La Paz (IdiPAZ)
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cancer
Instrumental study
Patient perspective
Patient-physician relationship
Shared decision-making
Medicina
topic Cancer
Instrumental study
Patient perspective
Patient-physician relationship
Shared decision-making
Medicina
description Background/Objective: This study sought to assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in patients with resected, non-metastatic cancer and eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. Method: A total of 568 patients were recruited from a multi-institutional, prospective, transversal study. Patients answered the SDM-Q-9 after visiting their medical oncologist who, in turn, completed the SDM-Q-Physician version. Reliability, factorial structures [exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)], and convergent validity of the SDM-Q-9 scores were explored. Results: SDM-Q-9 showed a clear factorial structure, compatible with a strong and replicable general factor and a secondary group factor, in patients with resected, non-metastatic cancer. Total sum scores derived from the general factor showed good reliability in terms of omega coefficient: .90. The association between patient and physician perception of SDM was weak and failed to reach statistical significance. Males and patients over 60 years of age displayed the greatest satisfaction with SDM. Conclusions: SDM-Q-9 can aid in evaluating SDM from the cancer patients' perspective. SDM-Q-9 is helpful in studies examining patient perspectives of SDM and as an indicator of the degree of quality and satisfaction with health care and patient-physician relationship.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv research article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10486/681681
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.12.001
url http://hdl.handle.net/10486/681681
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.12.001
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Española de Psicología Conductual
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
instname:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
instname_str Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
reponame_str Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
collection Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405929112338432
spelling Psychometric properties of the Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in oncology practicePropiedades psicométricas del Questionnaire Shared Decision-Making (SDM-Q-9) en oncologíaCalderón, CaterinaJiménez-Fonseca, PaulaFerrando, Pere JoanJara, CarlosLorenzo-Seva, UrbanoBeato, CarmenGarcía-García, TeresaCastelo Fernández, BeatrizRamchandani, AvinashMuñoz, María MarMartínez de Castro, EvaGhanem, IsmaelMangas, MontseCarmona-Bayonas, AlbertoCancerInstrumental studyPatient perspectivePatient-physician relationshipShared decision-makingMedicinaBackground/Objective: This study sought to assess the psychometric properties of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in patients with resected, non-metastatic cancer and eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. Method: A total of 568 patients were recruited from a multi-institutional, prospective, transversal study. Patients answered the SDM-Q-9 after visiting their medical oncologist who, in turn, completed the SDM-Q-Physician version. Reliability, factorial structures [exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)], and convergent validity of the SDM-Q-9 scores were explored. Results: SDM-Q-9 showed a clear factorial structure, compatible with a strong and replicable general factor and a secondary group factor, in patients with resected, non-metastatic cancer. Total sum scores derived from the general factor showed good reliability in terms of omega coefficient: .90. The association between patient and physician perception of SDM was weak and failed to reach statistical significance. Males and patients over 60 years of age displayed the greatest satisfaction with SDM. Conclusions: SDM-Q-9 can aid in evaluating SDM from the cancer patients' perspective. SDM-Q-9 is helpful in studies examining patient perspectives of SDM and as an indicator of the degree of quality and satisfaction with health care and patient-physician relationship.Antecedentes/Objetivo: Este estudio analiza las propiedades psicométricas del Questionnaire Shared Decision-Making (SDM-Q-9) en pacientes con cáncer resecado, no metastásico y elegible para quimioterapia adyuvante. Métodos: Un total de 568 pacientes fueron reclutados en un estudio multiinstitucional, prospectivo, transversal. Los pacientes respondieron al SDM-Q-9 después de visitar a su oncólogo que, a su vez, completó el SDM-Q-versión médico. Se estudiaron la fiabilidad, la estructura factorial (análisis factorial exploratorio y análisis factorial confirmatorio) y la validez convergente de las puntuaciones del SDM-Q-9.Resultados: La escala SDM-Q-9 mostró una estructura factorial clara, compatible con un factor general fuerte y replicable y un factor de grupo secundario, en pacientes con cáncer resecado y no metastásico. La puntuación del factor general mostró una buena fiabilidad en términos de coeficiente omega: 0,90. La asociación entre la percepción del médico y del paciente en la SDM fue débil y no logró alcanzar significación estadística. Los hombres y los pacientes mayores de 60 años mostraron mayor satisfacción con la toma de decisión compartida. Conclusiones: SDM-Q-9 puede ayudar en la evaluación de la toma de decisión compartida desde la perspectiva de los pacientes de cáncer y como indicador del grado de calidad y satisfacción en el cuidado de la salud en la relación médico-pacienteThis work was funded by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) in 2015Asociación Española de Psicología ConductualDepartamento de MedicinaFacultad de MedicinaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario de La Paz (IdiPAZ)20182018-01-01research articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/681681https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.12.001reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAMinstname:Universidad Autónoma de MadridInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/6816812026-06-23T12:46:27Z
score 15.198674

Similares en LA Referencia