Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature

Background: Rare diseases (RDs) and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) remain under-researched due to their low prevalence, leaving significant gaps in diagnostic strategies. Beyond next-generation sequencing, epigenetic profiling and particularly episignatures have emerged as a promising complemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Alegret-García, Albert, Cáceres, Alejandro, Sevilla-Porras, Marta, Pérez Jurado, Luis Alberto, González, Juan Ramón
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/72851
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13123043
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:DMPs
DMRs
DNA methylation
VUS
Episignatures
Machine learning
Neurodevelopmental disorders
Rare disease
id ES_353e043617e7ea87c8e5caa866e35142
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10230/72851
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literatureAlegret-García, AlbertCáceres, AlejandroSevilla-Porras, MartaPérez Jurado, Luis AlbertoGonzález, Juan RamónDMPsDMRsDNA methylationVUSEpisignaturesMachine learningNeurodevelopmental disordersRare diseaseBackground: Rare diseases (RDs) and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) remain under-researched due to their low prevalence, leaving significant gaps in diagnostic strategies. Beyond next-generation sequencing, epigenetic profiling and particularly episignatures have emerged as a promising complementary diagnostic tool and for reclassifying variants of uncertain significance (VUS). However, clinical implementation remains limited, hindered by non-standardized methodologies and restricted data sharing that impede the development of sufficiently large datasets for robust episignature development. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify all studies reporting episignatures published between 2014 and 2025. The review summarizes methodological approaches used for episignature detection and implementation, as well as reports of epimutations. Results: A total of 108 studies met the inclusion criteria. All but three employed Illumina methylation arrays, mostly 450 K and EPIC versions for patient sample analysis. Three main methodological phases were identified: data quality control, episignature detection, and classification model training. Despite methodological variability across these stages, most studies demonstrated high predictive capabilities, often relying on methodologies developed by a small number of leading groups. Conclusions: Epigenetic screening has significant potential to improve diagnostic yield in RDs and NDDs. Continued methodological refinement and collaborative standardization efforts will be crucial for its successful integration into clinical practice. Nevertheless, key challenges persist, including the need for secure and ethical data-sharing frameworks, external validation, and methodological standardization.MDPI2026202620252026info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10230/72851http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13123043https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72851reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésBiomedicines. 2025;13(12):3043© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/728512026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
title Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
spellingShingle Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
Alegret-García, Albert
DMPs
DMRs
DNA methylation
VUS
Episignatures
Machine learning
Neurodevelopmental disorders
Rare disease
title_short Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort Analysis methods for diagnosing rare neurodevelopmental diseases with episignatures: a systematic review of the literature
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alegret-García, Albert
Cáceres, Alejandro
Sevilla-Porras, Marta
Pérez Jurado, Luis Alberto
González, Juan Ramón
author Alegret-García, Albert
author_facet Alegret-García, Albert
Cáceres, Alejandro
Sevilla-Porras, Marta
Pérez Jurado, Luis Alberto
González, Juan Ramón
author_role author
author2 Cáceres, Alejandro
Sevilla-Porras, Marta
Pérez Jurado, Luis Alberto
González, Juan Ramón
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DMPs
DMRs
DNA methylation
VUS
Episignatures
Machine learning
Neurodevelopmental disorders
Rare disease
topic DMPs
DMRs
DNA methylation
VUS
Episignatures
Machine learning
Neurodevelopmental disorders
Rare disease
description Background: Rare diseases (RDs) and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) remain under-researched due to their low prevalence, leaving significant gaps in diagnostic strategies. Beyond next-generation sequencing, epigenetic profiling and particularly episignatures have emerged as a promising complementary diagnostic tool and for reclassifying variants of uncertain significance (VUS). However, clinical implementation remains limited, hindered by non-standardized methodologies and restricted data sharing that impede the development of sufficiently large datasets for robust episignature development. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify all studies reporting episignatures published between 2014 and 2025. The review summarizes methodological approaches used for episignature detection and implementation, as well as reports of epimutations. Results: A total of 108 studies met the inclusion criteria. All but three employed Illumina methylation arrays, mostly 450 K and EPIC versions for patient sample analysis. Three main methodological phases were identified: data quality control, episignature detection, and classification model training. Despite methodological variability across these stages, most studies demonstrated high predictive capabilities, often relying on methodologies developed by a small number of leading groups. Conclusions: Epigenetic screening has significant potential to improve diagnostic yield in RDs and NDDs. Continued methodological refinement and collaborative standardization efforts will be crucial for its successful integration into clinical practice. Nevertheless, key challenges persist, including the need for secure and ethical data-sharing frameworks, external validation, and methodological standardization.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
2026
2026
2026
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13123043
https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72851
url https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72851
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13123043
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Biomedicines. 2025;13(12):3043
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv MDPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405868830752768
score 15,812455