Local dietary adaptations of the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis

As human activities continue to reshape ecosystems, understanding wildlife adaptations is crucial in ecology. This study examines how the opportunistic yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis adjusts its diet and foraging behaviour during breeding to new, human-related feeding opportunities in a highly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lorenzo Torres, María, Forero, Manuela G., Ramírez, Francisco|||0000-0001-9670-486X, Giménez, Joan|||0000-0001-9207-4792, Ferrer-Vilaplana, Aleix, Reyes-González, José Manuel, García-Alfonso, Marina, Finlayson, Stewart, Bensusan, Keith, Afán, Isabel|||0000-0003-3874-0461
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:uabarcelona_::cca51c28bc828c16ba57d783e8fb6753
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/328961
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.3354/meps15122
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Foraging strategy
GPS tracking
Stable isotopes
Opportunistic species
Anthropogenic resources
Breeding season
Descripción
Sumario:As human activities continue to reshape ecosystems, understanding wildlife adaptations is crucial in ecology. This study examines how the opportunistic yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis adjusts its diet and foraging behaviour during breeding to new, human-related feeding opportunities in a highly humanized region of the southern Iberian Peninsula. Specifically, we combined Global Positioning System tracking technology, Geographic Information Systems and stable isotope analysis (SIA) to assess habitat choice and resource selection in relation to habitat characteristics and human activities, both on land and at sea, across 4 gull colonies. Overall, gulls exhibited a generalist foraging behaviour, with terrestrial habitats preferred over marine (61.87 vs. 38.13%, respectively). However, habitat utilisation patterns differed among colonies. SIA confirmed the incorporation of both terrestrial and marine resources in the diet, also with important differences among colonies. Additionally, a significant proportion of foraging activity was recorded in urban and highly exploited marine areas, underscoring the notable influence of human activity and the dependency of the species on anthropogenic food subsidies. This study reinforces previous knowledge about the trophic plasticity of this species. Through a holistic approach, the results indicate the extent to which local and sometimes differential adaptations in resource use may arise in response to specific human activities. In the context of highly regulatory policies for the management of landfills and fisheries, future studies should monitor the responses of these organisms to sudden shifts in the availability of predictable anthropogenic food subsidies.