A Delphi consensus panel about clinical management of early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Spain

This Delphi panel study assessed the level of consensus between medical oncologists on the clinical management of patients with early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A modified two-round Delphi approach was used. A scientific committee comprised of medical oncologists develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Isla, Dolores|||0000-0002-2483-198X, Felip, Enriqueta|||0000-0002-7620-0098, Garrido, Pilar|||0000-0002-5899-6125, Insa, Amelia|||0000-0002-3438-6170, Majem Tarruella, Margarita|||0000-0002-9919-7485, Remon, Jordi|||0000-0002-9462-875X, Trigo, Jose M., De Castro, Javier|||0000-0002-3622-6306
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:303878
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/303878
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/s12094-022-02941-5
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Adjuvant
Consensus
Delphi method
EGFR-mutated
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Osimertinib
Descripción
Sumario:This Delphi panel study assessed the level of consensus between medical oncologists on the clinical management of patients with early-stage EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A modified two-round Delphi approach was used. A scientific committee comprised of medical oncologists developed an online questionnaire. Delphi panel experts rated their level of agreement with each questionnaire statement on a 9-point Likert scale. The questionnaire included 36 statements from 3 domains (clinical management of early-stage NSCLC: 15 statements; role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC: 9 statements; and role of adjuvant therapy in early-stage NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutation: 12 statements). In round 1, consensus was reached for 24/36 statements (66.7%). Nine statements that did not achieve consensus after the first round were evaluated in round 2, and none of them reached consensus. Overall, 84.4% of the panelists agreed that EGFR mutation testing should be done after surgery. Consensus was not achieved on whether the implementation of EGFR mutation testing in resected early-stage NSCLC could limit the use of adjuvant osimertinib. The panelists recognized the rationale for the use of osimertinib in the adjuvant scenario (88%) and 72% agreed that it may change the treatment paradigm in stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Consensus was not reached on the inconvenience of prolonged duration of osimertinib. This Delphi study provides valuable insights into relevant questions in the management of early-stage EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, specific issues remain unresolved. The expert consensus emphasizes the role of adjuvant treatment with osimertinib in this scenario.