Efectos del entrenamiento de fuerza sobre variables de rehabilitación cardíaca en pacientes con insuficiencia cardíaca
Introduction. People with heart failure (HF) find their quality of life, functional capacity and heart function affected. Aim. To compare the influence resistance training (RT) versuscontrol group (CG) on outcomes ofcardiacrehabilitation (CR) in patients with HF. Method. We conducted a review of sys...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositorio: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/46840 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.28957/rcmfr.v30n1a2 https://hdl.handle.net/10578/46840 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Cardiacrehabilitation Ejercicio Entrenamiento de resistencia Exercise,resistance training Heart failure insuficiencia cardíaca Rehabilitación cardíaca Terapia con ejercicio |
| Sumario: | Introduction. People with heart failure (HF) find their quality of life, functional capacity and heart function affected. Aim. To compare the influence resistance training (RT) versuscontrol group (CG) on outcomes ofcardiacrehabilitation (CR) in patients with HF. Method. We conducted a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes in PubMed and Web of Science up to March 2020. A total of 545 articles were identified, of which 5 were selected for this review. The ‘Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2’ (AMSTAR-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Results. In the included studies a total of 13 different interventions were identified with 329 patients (mean age range = 48-77 years) with HF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. One study had a high level of confidence and 4 studies had a moderate level of confidence (AMSTAR-2). RT showed significant improvements on quality of life, aerobic capacity, peak heart rate and muscle strength compared to CG. No significant differences were found on left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end diastolic volume. Conclusions. RT is an adequate and necessary exercise intervention in the CR of patients with HF. Studies are necessary to analyze the effects of RT according to characteristics of training, age, severity of HF and pharmacological treatment |
|---|