Effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention program in the reduction of caregiver burden in alzheimer's disease patients' caregivers
[EN] Objectives Caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) experience physical and psychological stress due to the caring experience. This study evaluated the benefits of a Psychoeducational Intervention Program (PIP) on caregiver burden in southern Europe. Methods A multicentre, prospecti...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2008 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Salamanca (USAL) |
| Repositorio: | GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/155531 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10366/155531 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Caregiver Burden Alzheimer’s disease Psychoeducational program Southern Europe Dementia |
| Sumario: | [EN] Objectives Caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) experience physical and psychological stress due to the caring experience. This study evaluated the benefits of a Psychoeducational Intervention Program (PIP) on caregiver burden in southern Europe. Methods A multicentre, prospective, randomised study was conducted. One hundred and fifteen caregivers of patients with clinical diagnosis of AD (DSM-IV-TR criteria, mini-mental score¼10–26) and functional impairment (Lawton and Brody Scale and Katz Index) were recruited. Caregivers were randomised to receive either PIP (IG: intervention group, n¼60) or standard care (CG: control group, n¼55). PIP consisted of eight individual sessions over 4 months for teaching strategies for confronting problems of AD patient care. Caregivers’ stress, quality of life and perceived health were measured using validated scales (Zarit, SF-36, GHQ-28, respectively) at baseline and after 4 and 10-months follow-up. Results Mean change in caregiver burden (Zarit baseline–Zarit final scores) was statistically significant (p¼0.0083) showing an improvement in the IG ( 8.09 points) and a worsening in the CG (2.08 points). The IG showed significant improvements in all the well-being perception areas measured by the SF-36 and a significantly lower score in the GHQ-28 (p¼0.0004). 97.7% of caregivers and 88.6% of therapists considered PIP ‘useful/very useful’ at 4 months (the end of PIP) whereas at 10 months the estimates were 93.2% and 86.3%, respectively. Conclusions Psychosocial training of caregivers can minimise caregiver distress and help them to develop problemsolving strategies. A PIP improves quality of life and the perceived health of caregivers of patients with AD. |
|---|