Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian
Coupled cluster and symmetry projected Hartree-Fock are two central paradigms in electronic structure theory. However, they are very different. Single reference coupled cluster is highly successful for treating weakly correlated systems but fails under strong correlation unless one sacrifices good q...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/161645 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/161645 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Mean field theory Coupled cluster Wave functions Parity Excited states |
| id |
ES_31c508f7c8e41c1f91aae4dbd7f3bc13 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/161645 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model HamiltonianWahlen-Strothman, J. M.Henderson, T. M.Hermes, M. R.Degroote, M.Qiu, Y.Zhao, J.Dukelsky, JorgeScuseria, G. E.Mean field theoryCoupled clusterWave functionsParityExcited statesCoupled cluster and symmetry projected Hartree-Fock are two central paradigms in electronic structure theory. However, they are very different. Single reference coupled cluster is highly successful for treating weakly correlated systems but fails under strong correlation unless one sacrifices good quantum numbers and works with broken-symmetry wave functions, which is unphysical for finite systems. Symmetry projection is effective for the treatment of strong correlation at the mean-field level through multireference non-orthogonal configuration interaction wavefunctions, but unlike coupled cluster, it is neither size extensive nor ideal for treating dynamic correlation. We here examine different scenarios for merging these two dissimilar theories. We carry out this exercise over the integrable Lipkin model Hamiltonian, which despite its simplicity, encompasses non-trivial physics for degenerate systems and can be solved via diagonalization for a very large number of particles. We show how symmetry projection and coupled cluster doubles individually fail in different correlation limits, whereas models that merge these two theories are highly successful over the entire phase diagram. Despite the simplicity of the Lipkin Hamiltonian, the lessons learned in this work will be useful for building an ab initio symmetry projected coupled cluster theory that we expect to be accurate in the weakly and strongly correlated limits, as well as the recoupling regime.This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry Program under Award No. DE-FG02- 09ER16053. G.E.S. is a Welch Foundation Chair (No. C- 0036). Computational resources for this work were supported in part by the Big-Data Private-Cloud Research Cyberinfrastructure MRI-award funded by NSF under Grant No. CNS- 1338099 and by Rice University. J.D. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and FEDER through Grant No. FIS2015-63770-P.Peer Reviewed10 pags., 6 figs., app.American Institute of PhysicsWelch FoundationNational Science Foundation (US)Rice UniversityMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad (España)Department of Energy (US)Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]2018201820172018info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/161645reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/FIS2015-63770-Phttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974989Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/1616452026-05-22T06:33:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian |
| title |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian |
| spellingShingle |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian Wahlen-Strothman, J. M. Mean field theory Coupled cluster Wave functions Parity Excited states |
| title_short |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian |
| title_full |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian |
| title_fullStr |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian |
| title_sort |
Merging symmetry projection methods with coupled cluster theory: Lessons from the Lipkin model Hamiltonian |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Wahlen-Strothman, J. M. Henderson, T. M. Hermes, M. R. Degroote, M. Qiu, Y. Zhao, J. Dukelsky, Jorge Scuseria, G. E. |
| author |
Wahlen-Strothman, J. M. |
| author_facet |
Wahlen-Strothman, J. M. Henderson, T. M. Hermes, M. R. Degroote, M. Qiu, Y. Zhao, J. Dukelsky, Jorge Scuseria, G. E. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Henderson, T. M. Hermes, M. R. Degroote, M. Qiu, Y. Zhao, J. Dukelsky, Jorge Scuseria, G. E. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Welch Foundation National Science Foundation (US) Rice University Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España) Department of Energy (US) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72] |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Mean field theory Coupled cluster Wave functions Parity Excited states |
| topic |
Mean field theory Coupled cluster Wave functions Parity Excited states |
| description |
Coupled cluster and symmetry projected Hartree-Fock are two central paradigms in electronic structure theory. However, they are very different. Single reference coupled cluster is highly successful for treating weakly correlated systems but fails under strong correlation unless one sacrifices good quantum numbers and works with broken-symmetry wave functions, which is unphysical for finite systems. Symmetry projection is effective for the treatment of strong correlation at the mean-field level through multireference non-orthogonal configuration interaction wavefunctions, but unlike coupled cluster, it is neither size extensive nor ideal for treating dynamic correlation. We here examine different scenarios for merging these two dissimilar theories. We carry out this exercise over the integrable Lipkin model Hamiltonian, which despite its simplicity, encompasses non-trivial physics for degenerate systems and can be solved via diagonalization for a very large number of particles. We show how symmetry projection and coupled cluster doubles individually fail in different correlation limits, whereas models that merge these two theories are highly successful over the entire phase diagram. Despite the simplicity of the Lipkin Hamiltonian, the lessons learned in this work will be useful for building an ab initio symmetry projected coupled cluster theory that we expect to be accurate in the weakly and strongly correlated limits, as well as the recoupling regime. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2018 2018 2018 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Publisher's version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/161645 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/161645 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2013-2016/FIS2015-63770-P https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974989 Sí |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Physics |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Physics |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| reponame_str |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| collection |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869405632361136128 |
| score |
15.81155 |