La “definición nominal de la verdad” y la “filosofía transcendental de los antiguos”. Antonio Millán-Puelles ante la interpretación kantiana de dos doctrinas filosóficas de origen aristotélico
In his Critique of pure reason Kant discusses two philosophical doctrines of Aristotelian origin: the definition of truth as adaequatio intellectus et rei and the theory of the transcendentals, condensed in the formula quodlibet ens est unum, verum, bonum. The Spanish philosopher Antonio Millán-Puel...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2009 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/22462 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/22462 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Aristóteles Millán-Puelles, Antonio Libertad Kant, Immanuel |
| Sumario: | In his Critique of pure reason Kant discusses two philosophical doctrines of Aristotelian origin: the definition of truth as adaequatio intellectus et rei and the theory of the transcendentals, condensed in the formula quodlibet ens est unum, verum, bonum. The Spanish philosopher Antonio Millán-Puelles has carried out, in two of his books, an examination of the value of this Kantian discussion. The aim of this paper is to comment on Millán- Puelles’ analysis and to complete it in certain points, in order to show its properly philosophical interest and its originality. |
|---|