Relative tendency of carbonyl compounds to form enamines

Equilibria between carbonyl compounds and their enamines (from O-TBDPS-derived prolinol) have been examined by NMR spectroscopy in DMSO-d 6. By comparing the exchange reactions between pairs (enamine A + carbonyl B → carbonyl A + enamine B), a quite general scale of the tendency of carbonyl groups t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Sánchez Pérez, Daniel, Bastida, David, Burés Amat, Jordi, Isart Garriga, Carles, Pineda, Oriol, Vilarrasa i Llorens, Jaume
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2012
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/158643
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/158643
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Reaccions d'addició
Compostos carbonílics
Enamines
Espectroscòpia de ressonància magnètica nuclear
Addition reactions
Carbonyl compounds
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Descripción
Sumario:Equilibria between carbonyl compounds and their enamines (from O-TBDPS-derived prolinol) have been examined by NMR spectroscopy in DMSO-d 6. By comparing the exchange reactions between pairs (enamine A + carbonyl B → carbonyl A + enamine B), a quite general scale of the tendency of carbonyl groups to form enamines has been established. Aldehydes quickly give enamines that are relatively more stable than those of ketones, but there are exceptions to this expected rule; for example, 1,3-dihydroxyacetone acetals or 3,5-dioxacyclohexanones (2-phenyl-1,3-dioxan-5-one and 2,2-dimethyl-1,3- dioxan-5-one) show a greater tendency to afford enamines than many α-substituted aldehydes