Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years

Purpose: A systematic review of the research conducted on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education in the last 5 years (2014–2019). Method: Seven databases were used to select those articles that included information on the implementation of Cooperative Learning in the different educational stages...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Bores-García, Daniel, Hortigüela-Alcalá, David, Fernández-Río, Francisco Javier, González-Calvo, Gustavo, Barba-Martín, Raúl
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Repositorio:BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
OAI Identifier:oai:burjcdigital.urjc.es:10115/28575
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28575
Access Level:acceso embargado
Palabra clave:Cooperative learning
pedagogical models
systematic review
educational research
id ES_3151cefb5656b63f6f0e6f8dbfc448cf
oai_identifier_str oai:burjcdigital.urjc.es:10115/28575
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five YearsBores-García, DanielHortigüela-Alcalá, DavidFernández-Río, Francisco JavierGonzález-Calvo, GustavoBarba-Martín, RaúlCooperative learningpedagogical modelssystematic revieweducational researchPurpose: A systematic review of the research conducted on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education in the last 5 years (2014–2019). Method: Seven databases were used to select those articles that included information on the implementation of Cooperative Learning in the different educational stages. After the exclusion criteria, 15 articles were fully assessed based on eight criteria: (1) year and author; (2) country; (3) number of participants, educational level, and duration of implementation; (4) type of research; (5) curricular content; (6) purpose of the research; (7) most relevant results; and (8) learning environment. Results: Results showed how research focused more on secondary education, mainly in short-term interventions. Most studies used qualitative and/or mixed methods, and dealt evenly with sports, motor skills, and physical abilities, leaving body expression underrepresented. Regarding the goals of the studies, social learning was the most frequently assessed, focusing on motivation, group climate, and teacher–student interaction. Criticisms regarding the shortness of the experiences and their fragmentation can still be considered valid. Conclusion: This review can help researchers and practitioners conduct Cooperative Learning intervention programs in primary and secondary Physical Education. They must be rigorous when they claim that they implement this pedagogical model in schools.Taylor and Francis202420242020info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10115/28575reponame:BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlosinstname:Universidad Rey Juan CarlosInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessoai:burjcdigital.urjc.es:10115/285752026-06-24T12:48:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
title Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
spellingShingle Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
Bores-García, Daniel
Cooperative learning
pedagogical models
systematic review
educational research
title_short Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
title_full Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
title_fullStr Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
title_full_unstemmed Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
title_sort Research on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education: Systematic Review of the Last Five Years
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bores-García, Daniel
Hortigüela-Alcalá, David
Fernández-Río, Francisco Javier
González-Calvo, Gustavo
Barba-Martín, Raúl
author Bores-García, Daniel
author_facet Bores-García, Daniel
Hortigüela-Alcalá, David
Fernández-Río, Francisco Javier
González-Calvo, Gustavo
Barba-Martín, Raúl
author_role author
author2 Hortigüela-Alcalá, David
Fernández-Río, Francisco Javier
González-Calvo, Gustavo
Barba-Martín, Raúl
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cooperative learning
pedagogical models
systematic review
educational research
topic Cooperative learning
pedagogical models
systematic review
educational research
description Purpose: A systematic review of the research conducted on Cooperative Learning in Physical Education in the last 5 years (2014–2019). Method: Seven databases were used to select those articles that included information on the implementation of Cooperative Learning in the different educational stages. After the exclusion criteria, 15 articles were fully assessed based on eight criteria: (1) year and author; (2) country; (3) number of participants, educational level, and duration of implementation; (4) type of research; (5) curricular content; (6) purpose of the research; (7) most relevant results; and (8) learning environment. Results: Results showed how research focused more on secondary education, mainly in short-term interventions. Most studies used qualitative and/or mixed methods, and dealt evenly with sports, motor skills, and physical abilities, leaving body expression underrepresented. Regarding the goals of the studies, social learning was the most frequently assessed, focusing on motivation, group climate, and teacher–student interaction. Criticisms regarding the shortness of the experiences and their fragmentation can still be considered valid. Conclusion: This review can help researchers and practitioners conduct Cooperative Learning intervention programs in primary and secondary Physical Education. They must be rigorous when they claim that they implement this pedagogical model in schools.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28575
url https://hdl.handle.net/10115/28575
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
instname:Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
instname_str Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
reponame_str BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
collection BURJC-Digital. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405603228549120
score 15.81155