A Comparative Analysis of the Panormia and the Collectio X Partium
The Collection in Ten Parts is heavily dependent on the Panormia: Parts 1–3 correspond to the books 1–3 of the Panormia, and parts 5–9 correspond to the Books 4–8. The similarity between collections is sometimes amazing: the sequence of the canons from the Panormia in Collectio X Partium is followed...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2010 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/42517 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/42517 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Panormia Derecho Derecho Canonico Collectio X Partium |
| Sumario: | The Collection in Ten Parts is heavily dependent on the Panormia: Parts 1–3 correspond to the books 1–3 of the Panormia, and parts 5–9 correspond to the Books 4–8. The similarity between collections is sometimes amazing: the sequence of the canons from the Panormia in Collectio X Partium is followed extremely closely in parts 1 and 6 to 9 (books 1 and 5 to 8 of the Panormia). But at certain points, the compiler of the Collectio X Partium departs from the Panormia and takes the auctoritates from other sources, some of them still unknown. This paper focuses on these differences in order to understand the compiler’s mind and, if possible, to discover its formal sources. |
|---|