Justificación de los poderes probatorios del juez en el proceso civil: elecciones, riesgos y propuestas de superación
In this essay, it will be afirmed that in order to reach rational and correct decisions, the civil procedure should be design in a way that allows both the judge and the parties to asumme an active role. For this purpose, the diferent models of procedures, and the principles and basis in which they...
| Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | master thesis |
| Publication Date: | 2019 |
| Country: | España |
| Institution: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repository: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/19041 |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19041 |
| Access Level: | Open access |
| Keyword: | Imparcialitat Fairness Procediment judicial Judicial process Jutges -- Ètica Professional Judges -- Professional ethics Procediment civil Civil procedure Prova (Dret) Evidence (Law) |
| Summary: | In this essay, it will be afirmed that in order to reach rational and correct decisions, the civil procedure should be design in a way that allows both the judge and the parties to asumme an active role. For this purpose, the diferent models of procedures, and the principles and basis in which they lay, will be analised, as well as the epistemic función of the civil procedure. It will also be discussed whether the judge ́s impartiality and the dispostive principle are jeopardized whenever the judge exercise evidentiary powers and the impact of congnitive biases. Finally, the diverse ways in which the evidentary powers can be exercised throughout the different procedural phases will be adressed |
|---|