Coincidence between the distribution of myofascial trigger points and the presence of blood vessels in the gastrocnemius muscle: Implications for invasive procedures

Purpose The gastrocnemius venous system presents different anatomical variants. There have been described four locations of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in this muscle. However, no studies have analyzed the coincidence between vessels and MTrPs present in the gastrocnemius. Therefore, the main...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Velasco Fernández, Patricia, Valera Garrido, Fermín, Valderrama Canales, Francisco José, Minaya Muñoz, Francisco, Herrero, Pablo, Lapuente Hernández, Diego
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositório:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/126327
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/126327
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:611
Anatomical variations
Gastrocnemius muscle
Gastrocnemius vessels
Myofascial trigger points
Ultrasound
Anatomía
2410.02 Anatomía Humana
Descrição
Resumo:Purpose The gastrocnemius venous system presents different anatomical variants. There have been described four locations of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in this muscle. However, no studies have analyzed the coincidence between vessels and MTrPs present in the gastrocnemius. Therefore, the main objective was to study the anatomical variability of the venous system by ultrasound and its coincidence with the location of the MTrPs. Methods A total of 100 lower limbs were studied. The gastrocnemius vessels were analyzed one by one by sector (medial, central, and lateral), quantifying the number of vessels, their distribution, and the coincidence with MTrPs. Results All muscle heads showed at least one vessel per section. A large variability was observed, from one to eight vessels per muscle head, with the most frequent number being three in the gastrocnemius medialis and two in the gastrocnemius lateralis. In all cases, the location of the vessels coincided with the MTrPs. Conclusions The proximal gastrocnemius venous pattern is very variable between subjects in number of vessels and distribution, which has made it impossible to define a “safe” approach window for invasive procedures without ultrasound guidance. The coincidence between the clinical location of MTrPs of the gastrocnemius and the presence of vessels is total.