Physiological ICSI (PICSI) vs. Conventional ICSI in Couples with Male Factor

To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. A systematic r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Avalos-Durán, Georgina, Ángel, Ana María Emilia Cañedo-Del, Rivero-Murillo, Juana, Zambrano-Guerrero, Jaime Enoc, Carballo-Mondragón, Esperanza, Checa, Miguel Angel|||0000-0002-0226-3416
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:190786
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/190786
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20180027
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:PICSI
Physiological ICSI
Hyaluronic acid
HA sperm selection
Male factor
Descripción
Sumario:To determine the efficacy of the physiological ICSI technique (PICSI) vs. conventional ICSI in the prognosis of couples with male factor, with respect to the following outcome measures: live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage rates. A systematic review of the literature, extracting raw data and performing data analysis. Patient(s): Couples with the male factor, who were subjected to in-vitro fertilization. Main Outcome Measures: rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage. In the systematic search, we found 2,918 studies and an additional study from other sources; only two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The rates of live births, clinical pregnancy, implantation, embryo quality, fertilization and miscarriage were similar for both groups. There is no statistically significant difference between PICSI vs. ICSI, for any of the outcomes analyzed in this study. Enough information is still not available to prove the efficacy of the PICSI technique over ICSI in couples with male factor.