Visceral leishmaniasis in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients a case series of 17 patients from the Mediterranean Coast of Spain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The introduction of novel therapies in multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved survival rates. However, their immunosuppressive nature predisposes patients to serious opportunistic infections, including visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Due to the rarity of VL in MM pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Monreal Bernal A, Berenguer Piqueras M, Ortiz Salvador P, Suarez Terron M, Bataller Alfonso A, Delgado Palacio S, Senent Peris ML, Roig Pellicer M, Villalba Valenzuela A, Benet Campos C, Espinosa Arnandi C, Fernández Poveda E, Salido Fierez E, Rodenas Quiñonero I, de Arriba de la Fuente F, Ortiz Andrade J, Marco Ayala J, Lozano ML, Ortuño FJ
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p18960
Acceso en línea:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/18960
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Bone marrow smear
liposomal amphotericin B
multiple myeloma
visceral leishmaniasis
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The introduction of novel therapies in multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved survival rates. However, their immunosuppressive nature predisposes patients to serious opportunistic infections, including visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Due to the rarity of VL in MM patients, specific management guidelines are lacking, and treatments are often extrapolated from those used for HIV-infected patients. This study aims to provide insights into the management of VL in MM patients. PATIENTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 17 patients diagnosed with MM and VL between 2014 and 2023 across hospitals on the Mediterranean coast of Spain. Clinical data, diagnostic methods, treatment responses, relapses, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Pancytopenia emerged as the most frequent presenting feature, accompanied by fever and splenomegaly in some cases. VL diagnosis was confirmed in all patients through visual analysis of bone marrow smears, while PCR and serological tests yielded inconsistent results. Treatment with the liposomal amphotericin B (lAmB) 40 regimen resulted in excellent initial responses; however, 53% of patients experienced relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Given the high relapse rate, secondary prophylaxis should be considered for selected patients, particularly those with more than 5 years of MM diagnosis or who have received more than two lines of treatment or immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). This study highlights the need for tailored management strategies for VL in MM patients and underscores the importance of vigilant follow-up.

Similares en LA Referencia