Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods

Incluye 1 fichero de datos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Sola Torralba, Ion, González de Audícana Amenábar, María, Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Data de publicação:2016
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Pública de Navarra
Repositório:Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
OAI Identifier:oai:academica-e.unavarra.es:2454/22503
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2454/22503
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Topographic correction
Evaluation
Comparison
Multi-criteria
id ES_2df9070ec591db6a04fbe900f4ef9c3a
oai_identifier_str oai:academica-e.unavarra.es:2454/22503
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methodsSola Torralba, IonGonzález de Audícana Amenábar, MaríaÁlvarez-Mozos, JesúsTopographic correctionEvaluationComparisonMulti-criteriaIncluye 1 fichero de datosIn the last decades, several topographic correction methods (TOC) have been proposed, but there is not an agreement on the best method. Furthermore, different evaluation criteria have been used in the past, and there is not any simple and objective evaluation procedure to measure the quality of the correction. Consequently, a multicriteria analysis of widely used topographic correction methods is required that evaluates their performance over different sensors, terrain and temporal configurations. In this work, ten TOC methods were assessed using seven different evaluation strategies. The analysis was carried out for three SPOT5 images acquired over a mountainous area of northern Spain. The images had different acquisition dates and solar angles, so as to evaluate performance under varying illumination conditions. The results obtained showed that Statistic-Empiricalmethod, CCorrection and Sun-Canopy-Sensor+C performed the best, and differences were minor when favorable illumination conditions were considered. For the seven tested evaluation strategies, interquartile range reduction of land covers or the comparison of sunlit and shaded slopes gave very similar results, whereas there were greater contrasts among other criteria.Part of the research presented in this paper is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness in the frame of the ESP2013-48458-C4-2-P project.ElsevierProyectos e Ingeniería RuralLanda Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak2016info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/ziphttps://hdl.handle.net/2454/22503reponame:Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarrainstname:Universidad Pública de NavarraInglésinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//ESP2013-48458-C4-2-P© 2016 Elsevier B.V. The manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:academica-e.unavarra.es:2454/225032026-06-17T12:41:47Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
title Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
spellingShingle Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
Sola Torralba, Ion
Topographic correction
Evaluation
Comparison
Multi-criteria
title_short Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
title_full Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
title_fullStr Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
title_full_unstemmed Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
title_sort Multi-criteria evaluation of topographic correction methods
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sola Torralba, Ion
González de Audícana Amenábar, María
Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús
author Sola Torralba, Ion
author_facet Sola Torralba, Ion
González de Audícana Amenábar, María
Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús
author_role author
author2 González de Audícana Amenábar, María
Álvarez-Mozos, Jesús
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Proyectos e Ingeniería Rural
Landa Ingeniaritza eta Proiektuak
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Topographic correction
Evaluation
Comparison
Multi-criteria
topic Topographic correction
Evaluation
Comparison
Multi-criteria
description Incluye 1 fichero de datos
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2454/22503
url https://hdl.handle.net/2454/22503
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//ESP2013-48458-C4-2-P
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv © 2016 Elsevier B.V. The manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv © 2016 Elsevier B.V. The manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
instname:Universidad Pública de Navarra
instname_str Universidad Pública de Navarra
reponame_str Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
collection Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405367066165248
score 15.812429

Registros relacionados