Heart wall rupture after a false negative computed tomography coronary angiography
Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is considered to be the highest sensitivity, noninvasive test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, with a negative predictive value of 97 to 99%. The case is presented of a ventricular free wall rupture after myocardial infarction, with a dela...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears |
| Repositorio: | Docusalut |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/17269 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/17269 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Computed tomography coronary angiography Coronary artery imaging Myocardial infarction Mechanical complications |
| Sumario: | Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is considered to be the highest sensitivity, noninvasive test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, with a negative predictive value of 97 to 99%. The case is presented of a ventricular free wall rupture after myocardial infarction, with a delayed diagnosis due to a false negative CTCA result. We believe that this case highlights possible limitations of widening CTCA indications and the importance of experience in the correct interpretation of the test. |
|---|