Validity of self-reported intensity of exposure to second-hand smoke at home against environmental and personal markers

The objective of this study was to assess the validity of two questions about the perception of intensity of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) at home using as a reference environmental markers (airborne nicotine and benzene) and biomarkers of exposure (cotinine in saliva and urine). This was a cro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martínez-Sánchez, Jose M., González-Marrón, Adrián, Martín-Sánchez, Juan Carlos, Sureda, Xisca, Fu, Marcela, Pérez Ortuño, Raúl, 1976-, Lidón-Moyano, Cristina, Galán, Iñaki, Pascual Esteban, José A., Fernández, Esteve
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/34759
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/34759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.08.002
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Tabaquisme passiu
Cotinina
Cotinine
Hogares
Home environment
Humo de tabaco ambiental
Marcadores personales
Nicotina
Nicotine
Personal markers
Second hand smoke
Validación
Validity
Descripción
Sumario:The objective of this study was to assess the validity of two questions about the perception of intensity of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) at home using as a reference environmental markers (airborne nicotine and benzene) and biomarkers of exposure (cotinine in saliva and urine). This was a cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of 49 non-smoking volunteers. We found a high correlation between self-reported SHS exposure and airborne nicotine (rsp=0.806, p<0.05), salivary cotinine (rsp=0.752, p<0.05), and urinary cotinine (rsp=0.626, p<0.05). We did not find differences between the score question and the conventional ones (p >0.05). In conclusion, the significant correlation of the two questions proposed with environmental markers and personal markers indicates their potential validity to assess exposure to SHS at home.