Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal
Whereas intersectionality presents a fruitful framework for theoretical and empirical research, some of its fundamental features present great confusion. The term ‘intersectionality’ and its metaphor of the crossroads seem to reproduce what it aims to avoid: conceiving categories as separate. Despit...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/60445 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350506820930734 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Feminist theory Gender Intersectionality Metaphor Reification Social category |
| id |
ES_2d3e3b03e4847b67bf72ce64bc49005c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:10230/60445 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposalRodó-Zárate, MariaJorba Grau, MartaFeminist theoryGenderIntersectionalityMetaphorReificationSocial categoryWhereas intersectionality presents a fruitful framework for theoretical and empirical research, some of its fundamental features present great confusion. The term ‘intersectionality’ and its metaphor of the crossroads seem to reproduce what it aims to avoid: conceiving categories as separate. Despite the attempts for developing new metaphors that illustrate the mutual constitution relation among categories, gender, race or class keep being imagined as discrete units that intersect, mix or combine. Here we identify two main problems in metaphors: the lack of differentiation between positions and effects and the problem of reification. We then present a new metaphor that overcomes these two problems: a basket of apples. We argue that considering social positions as the diverse properties of different apples avoids reification by considering categories as properties and not as objects themselves, and at the same time it allows us to think about the effects dimension from a plural and contextual approach. With this shift, we propose a reframing of the discussion in debates on intersectionality theory on the relation among categories, their in/separability and fragmentation.The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial supportfor the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: Financial support for this work was provided by postdoctoral fellows IJCI-2017-34112 (M.J.) and IJCI-2016-27422 (M. R-Z). MJ also acknowledges the support of the project Social Metaphysics: PGC2018-094563-B-I00 MCIU/AEI/FEDER UE.SAGE Publications202420242022info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/60445http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350506820930734reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésEuropean Journal of Women's Studies. 2022 Feb;29(1):23-38info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PGC2018-094563-B-I00Rodó-Zárate M, Jorba M. Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal. European journal of women's studies. 2022 Feb;29(1):23-38. © The Author(s) 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1350506820930734info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/604452026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal |
| title |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal |
| spellingShingle |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal Rodó-Zárate, Maria Feminist theory Gender Intersectionality Metaphor Reification Social category |
| title_short |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal |
| title_full |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal |
| title_fullStr |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal |
| title_sort |
Metaphors of intersectionality: reframing the debate with a new proposal |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rodó-Zárate, Maria Jorba Grau, Marta |
| author |
Rodó-Zárate, Maria |
| author_facet |
Rodó-Zárate, Maria Jorba Grau, Marta |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Jorba Grau, Marta |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Feminist theory Gender Intersectionality Metaphor Reification Social category |
| topic |
Feminist theory Gender Intersectionality Metaphor Reification Social category |
| description |
Whereas intersectionality presents a fruitful framework for theoretical and empirical research, some of its fundamental features present great confusion. The term ‘intersectionality’ and its metaphor of the crossroads seem to reproduce what it aims to avoid: conceiving categories as separate. Despite the attempts for developing new metaphors that illustrate the mutual constitution relation among categories, gender, race or class keep being imagined as discrete units that intersect, mix or combine. Here we identify two main problems in metaphors: the lack of differentiation between positions and effects and the problem of reification. We then present a new metaphor that overcomes these two problems: a basket of apples. We argue that considering social positions as the diverse properties of different apples avoids reification by considering categories as properties and not as objects themselves, and at the same time it allows us to think about the effects dimension from a plural and contextual approach. With this shift, we propose a reframing of the discussion in debates on intersectionality theory on the relation among categories, their in/separability and fragmentation. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 2024 2024 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350506820930734 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/60445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350506820930734 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
European Journal of Women's Studies. 2022 Feb;29(1):23-38 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/2PE/PGC2018-094563-B-I00 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SAGE Publications |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869405302010413056 |
| score |
15,812429 |