Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review

This review elucidates the advantages and disadvantages of the different implant navigation methods to assist the precise surgical placement of dental implants. Implant navigation surgery can be classified into: dynamic and static navigation, and static navigation can further be divided into full (F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi, Barootchi, Shayan, Salomó-Coll, Oscar, Wang, Hom-Lay
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/3999
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3999
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.04.005
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Odontologia
Odontología
Dentistry
616.3
id ES_2d2d3189db5d9d2239fa88aace4db32a
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/3999
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic reviewGargallo-Albiol, JordiBarootchi, ShayanSalomó-Coll, OscarWang, Hom-LayOdontologiaOdontologíaDentistry616.3This review elucidates the advantages and disadvantages of the different implant navigation methods to assist the precise surgical placement of dental implants. Implant navigation surgery can be classified into: dynamic and static navigation, and static navigation can further be divided into full (FG)- and half-guided (HG) implant surgery. The HG implant placement includes the drilling-guided, pilot-drill guided, and the non-computed guided approaches. In dynamic navigation, the bone drilling and the implant placement are completely tracked with a specific software; while the static navigation refers to the use of static surgical templates. The FG associated with flapless surgery and teeth/crown supported guides has demonstrated the highest accuracy, followed by the drilling and pilot HG surgery that may provide comparable results, while the non-computer HG and FH implant placement provide the least accuracy in transmitting the implant positioning from the pre-surgical planning to the patient. Additionally, flapless implant surgery is related to reduced pain, less analgesic consumption, less swelling, shorter chair-time, and reduced risk of hemorrhage while achieving greater patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, other methods such as non-computer HG and FH implant surgery procedures require more surgical experience to overcome their limitations. There is still limited evidence to support dynamic surgery, and further investigations are needed.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionElsevier2019info:eu-repo/semantics/article10http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3999https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.04.005reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésAnnals of Anatomy225© 2024 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/39992026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
title Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
spellingShingle Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
Odontologia
Odontología
Dentistry
616.3
title_short Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
title_full Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
title_fullStr Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
title_sort Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
Barootchi, Shayan
Salomó-Coll, Oscar
Wang, Hom-Lay
author Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
author_facet Gargallo-Albiol, Jordi
Barootchi, Shayan
Salomó-Coll, Oscar
Wang, Hom-Lay
author_role author
author2 Barootchi, Shayan
Salomó-Coll, Oscar
Wang, Hom-Lay
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Odontologia
Odontología
Dentistry
616.3
topic Odontologia
Odontología
Dentistry
616.3
description This review elucidates the advantages and disadvantages of the different implant navigation methods to assist the precise surgical placement of dental implants. Implant navigation surgery can be classified into: dynamic and static navigation, and static navigation can further be divided into full (FG)- and half-guided (HG) implant surgery. The HG implant placement includes the drilling-guided, pilot-drill guided, and the non-computed guided approaches. In dynamic navigation, the bone drilling and the implant placement are completely tracked with a specific software; while the static navigation refers to the use of static surgical templates. The FG associated with flapless surgery and teeth/crown supported guides has demonstrated the highest accuracy, followed by the drilling and pilot HG surgery that may provide comparable results, while the non-computer HG and FH implant placement provide the least accuracy in transmitting the implant positioning from the pre-surgical planning to the patient. Additionally, flapless implant surgery is related to reduced pain, less analgesic consumption, less swelling, shorter chair-time, and reduced risk of hemorrhage while achieving greater patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, other methods such as non-computer HG and FH implant surgery procedures require more surgical experience to overcome their limitations. There is still limited evidence to support dynamic surgery, and further investigations are needed.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3999
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.04.005
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/3999
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2019.04.005
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Annals of Anatomy
225
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv © 2024 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv © 2024 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 10
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405297366269952
score 15.812429

Similares en LA Referencia