Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set

Finite state model predictive control (FSMPC) of multiphase drives can use an extra number of inverter configurations compared with the three-phase case. This, however, requires more computing power for the optimization phase. The application time of each selected voltage vector (VV) is then increas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Arahal, Manuel R., Barrero, Federico, Bermúdez Guzmán, Mario, Garrido Satué, Manuel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/150638
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/150638
https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3172138
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Induction Machines
Multi-phase systems
Performance map
Predictive control
Voltage vectors
id ES_2c10eec5fe7c97d9fda1c182ccfa694e
oai_identifier_str oai:idus.us.es:11441/150638
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control SetArahal, Manuel R.Barrero, FedericoBermúdez Guzmán, MarioGarrido Satué, ManuelInduction MachinesMulti-phase systemsPerformance mapPredictive controlVoltage vectorsFinite state model predictive control (FSMPC) of multiphase drives can use an extra number of inverter configurations compared with the three-phase case. This, however, requires more computing power for the optimization phase. The application time of each selected voltage vector (VV) is then increased, which can result in higher harmonic content. Reducing the allowed VVs can speed up the computations, thus ameliorating the current tracking/regulation in different orthogonal subspaces. However, the flexibility offered by the reduced set of VVs is less than that of the full set. Furthermore, a lower sampling time can result in an increase in the switching frequency, especially for some speed-load combinations. This article proposes the use of a hybrid scheme where the set of allowed VVs is not fixed but rather selected on-line according to the actual speed and torque producing stator current which are computed by the outer loop. A five-phase induction machine (IM) is used as a test bed for the proposal, showing improved results with respect to the nonhybrid case.Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación RTI2018-101897-B-I00Institute of Electrical and Electronics EngineersIngeniería de Sistemas y AutomáticaIngeniería ElectrónicaIngeniería EléctricaTIC201: ACE-TITEP196: Sistemas de Energía EléctricaMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). España2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/150638https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3172138reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)InglésIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 11 (2), 1444-1453.RTI2018-101897-B-I00https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9767203info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/1506382026-06-17T12:51:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
title Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
spellingShingle Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
Arahal, Manuel R.
Induction Machines
Multi-phase systems
Performance map
Predictive control
Voltage vectors
title_short Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
title_full Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
title_fullStr Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
title_sort Predictive Stator Current Control of a Five-Phase Motor Using a Hybrid Control Set
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arahal, Manuel R.
Barrero, Federico
Bermúdez Guzmán, Mario
Garrido Satué, Manuel
author Arahal, Manuel R.
author_facet Arahal, Manuel R.
Barrero, Federico
Bermúdez Guzmán, Mario
Garrido Satué, Manuel
author_role author
author2 Barrero, Federico
Bermúdez Guzmán, Mario
Garrido Satué, Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Ingeniería de Sistemas y Automática
Ingeniería Electrónica
Ingeniería Eléctrica
TIC201: ACE-TI
TEP196: Sistemas de Energía Eléctrica
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). España
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Induction Machines
Multi-phase systems
Performance map
Predictive control
Voltage vectors
topic Induction Machines
Multi-phase systems
Performance map
Predictive control
Voltage vectors
description Finite state model predictive control (FSMPC) of multiphase drives can use an extra number of inverter configurations compared with the three-phase case. This, however, requires more computing power for the optimization phase. The application time of each selected voltage vector (VV) is then increased, which can result in higher harmonic content. Reducing the allowed VVs can speed up the computations, thus ameliorating the current tracking/regulation in different orthogonal subspaces. However, the flexibility offered by the reduced set of VVs is less than that of the full set. Furthermore, a lower sampling time can result in an increase in the switching frequency, especially for some speed-load combinations. This article proposes the use of a hybrid scheme where the set of allowed VVs is not fixed but rather selected on-line according to the actual speed and torque producing stator current which are computed by the outer loop. A five-phase induction machine (IM) is used as a test bed for the proposal, showing improved results with respect to the nonhybrid case.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11441/150638
https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3172138
url https://hdl.handle.net/11441/150638
https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3172138
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, 11 (2), 1444-1453.
RTI2018-101897-B-I00
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9767203
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
instname_str Universidad de Sevilla (US)
reponame_str idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
collection idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405203590021120
score 15.301603

Similares en LA Referencia