Fitness and life-history traits of the two major mitochondrial DNA haplotypes of <i>Drosophila subobscura</i>
Mitochondrial DNA restriction site analyses on natural populations of Drosophila subobscura have proved the existence of two common, coexisting haplotypes ( I and II), as well as a set of less frequent ones derived from them. To explain this distribution, experiments to date point practically to all...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2004 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO) |
| Repositorio: | r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p17205 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/17205 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | fitness components natural selection cytonuclear interactions mtDNA haplotypes Drosophila subobscura |
| Sumario: | Mitochondrial DNA restriction site analyses on natural populations of Drosophila subobscura have proved the existence of two common, coexisting haplotypes ( I and II), as well as a set of less frequent ones derived from them. To explain this distribution, experiments to date point practically to all possible genetic mechanisms being involved in the changes of gene frequencies (cytonuclear coadaptation, direct natural selection on mtDNA and genetic drift). In an attempt to find differences that help to understand the dynamics of these haplotypes and to detect the effect of selection, we measured certain fitness components and life-history traits ( egg - larva and larva - adult viabilities and developmental times, longevity, resistance to desiccation and optimal density) of the two main haplotypes I and II when maintained in laboratory population cages. As a general trend, haplotype II showed a higher net fitness than haplotype I, which explains the superiority of haplotype II over haplotype I in experimental populations but not their coexistence in nature, where additional factors must be considered. |
|---|