Antinaturaleza y eutanasia

The author of this article reviews the different meanings attributed to the concept of euthanasis. The involves a very ample perspective, taking into account the historical, clinical, philosophical, ethical, juridical, sociological, and religious aspects of the question. After this compact and strai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Polaino-Lorente, A. (A.)|||/items/18603948-7989-4e42-80c4-64e0dd403515
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:1975
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Navarra
Repositorio:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Idioma:español
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/12188
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/12188
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Materias Investigacion::Derecho
Descripción
Sumario:The author of this article reviews the different meanings attributed to the concept of euthanasis. The involves a very ample perspective, taking into account the historical, clinical, philosophical, ethical, juridical, sociological, and religious aspects of the question. After this compact and straightforward synthesis, the author then analyzes and criticizes the paradoxes which arise within contemporary society with re ference to the term «euthanasia •. From the fear of pain to collectivistic utilitarianism, the possibility of euthanasia is presented today, although we repeatedly find contradictions in every instance. Finally, the author analyzes the meaning of euthanasia from the point of view of nature, affirming that it is tantamount to the very negation of nature. At the same time, the fallacies to be found in the arguments of the proponents of euthanasia are brought to light. The author then ends with the proposal of reserving the term «euthanasia» -once its confused meaning has been refined- for the sole purpose of signifying the antinatural extermination of mano