La práctica del alterum non laedere
In this paper I claim that alterum non laedere is the main tenet of tort liability, and without it many features of our tort law systems become unintelligible. Once the role that alterum non laedere plays in legal reasoning is established it can be seen that the practice of tort law is articulated o...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10256/26044 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10256/26044 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Responsabilitat civil Danys i perjudicis Liability (Law) Damages Dret -- Filosofia Law -- Philosophy |
| Sumario: | In this paper I claim that alterum non laedere is the main tenet of tort liability, and without it many features of our tort law systems become unintelligible. Once the role that alterum non laedere plays in legal reasoning is established it can be seen that the practice of tort law is articulated on harm prevention and only secondarily on reparation. In addition, this thesis has important theoretical implications |
|---|