The MCMI-III personality disorders scores predicted by the NEO-FFI-R and the ZKPQ-50-CC: a comparative study
This study was designed to compare the NEO-FFI-R versus the ZKPQ-50-CC in their relationships with the fourteen MCMI-III personality disorder scales in a Spanish non-clinical sample (N=674). Previous studies showed consistent relationships between the Five Factor Model and the DSM-IV personality dis...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2007 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/132670 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/132670 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | MCMI-III NEO-FFI-R ZKPQ-50-CC Personality disorders predictions Psicología clínica y psicodiagnóstico Personalidad Psicología diferencial 61 Psicología |
| Sumario: | This study was designed to compare the NEO-FFI-R versus the ZKPQ-50-CC in their relationships with the fourteen MCMI-III personality disorder scales in a Spanish non-clinical sample (N=674). Previous studies showed consistent relationships between the Five Factor Model and the DSM-IV personality disorders (PD), but there is no comparative study between both Five Factor and Zuckerman’s personality models. The aim was to replicate previous results about relationships between the Big-Five and PD’s using the revised short version of the NEO-PI-R, and to compare the NEO-FFI-R versus the ZKPQ-50-CC regarding the relationships with MCMI-III personality disorder scales. Results showed no sharp differences between the NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC scales. Each instrument explained around 30% of the PD’s MCMI-III scales variance. Using conjointly the 10 personality scales from the NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC, the PD’s accounted variance rose to 38%. Differences and similarities between both short personality questionnaires are discussed. |
|---|