Reassessing Welfare State Generosity: A Focus on New Social Risks

[EN] This paper addresses the long-standing issue of welfare state generosity measurement, by adopting a new perspective that focus on how welfare states are responding to new social risks linked to emergent forms of vulnerability. Namely, an emphasis is put on labour market polarization as well as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Lòpez Gallego, Julian, Buendía García, Luis
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2026
País:España
Institución:Universidad de León
Repositorio:BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
OAI Identifier:oai:dnet:buleria_____::ef45cfce1d422656e703bd603e3c14c7
Acceso en línea:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205-026-03808-w
https://hdl.handle.net/10612/28069
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Economía
Estadística
General welfare
Well-being
Government expenditures and welfare programs
Social policy
Welfare-state regimes
Descripción
Sumario:[EN] This paper addresses the long-standing issue of welfare state generosity measurement, by adopting a new perspective that focus on how welfare states are responding to new social risks linked to emergent forms of vulnerability. Namely, an emphasis is put on labour market polarization as well as childcare needs in the context of family model changes. Our work therefore constitutes a re-examination of Esping-Andersen’s The Worlds of Welfare State hypothesis and his main empirical application, made by revisioning both the analytical and methodological basis behind the so-called Welfare-State Decommodification Index. The results rest on a collection of public data from various statistical sources and point out that, at least concerning new social risks, the conventional division between social-democratic Nordic Europe and more conservative Continental Europe welfare regimes is somewhat blurred. Furthermore, dynamic versions of the indexes are constructed to examine the question of welfare state retrenchment and mixed-insights are found.