Self-adhesive hydrogel meshes reduce tissue incorporation and mechanical behavior versus microgrips self-fixation: a preclinical study.

Purpose: Atraumatic mesh fixation for abdominal hernia repair has been developed to avoid the disadvantages of classical fixation with sutures, which is considered a cause of chronic pain and discomfort. This study was designed to analyze, in the short and medium term, the biological and mechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Benito Martínez, Selma|||0000-0002-3118-0564, Rodríguez Mancheño, Marta, García-Moreno Nisa, Francisca|||0000-0001-5360-0577, Pérez Köhler, Bárbara|||0000-0002-5061-1526, Peña, Estefanía, Calvo Calzada, Begoña, Pascual González, María Gemma|||0000-0002-1623-4384, Bellón Caneiro, Juan Manuel|||0000-0002-6071-5011
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Alcalá (UAH)
Repositorio:e_Buah Biblioteca Digital Universidad de Alcalá
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ebuah.uah.es:10017/59338
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10017/59338
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02552-z
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Hernia repair
Self-adhesive meshes
Self-gripping meshes
Tissue integration
Biomechanical test
Medicina
Medicine
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: Atraumatic mesh fixation for abdominal hernia repair has been developed to avoid the disadvantages of classical fixation with sutures, which is considered a cause of chronic pain and discomfort. This study was designed to analyze, in the short and medium term, the biological and mechanical behavior of two self-fixing meshes compared to that of a polypropylene (PP) mesh fixed with a cyanoacrylate (CA) tissue adhesive. Methods: Partial abdominal wall defects (6 × 4 cm) were created in New Zealand rabbits (n = 36) and repaired using a selfadhesive hydrogel mesh (Adhesix?), a self-gripping mesh (ProGrip?) or a PP mesh fixed with CA (Surgipro? CA). After 14 and 90 days, the host tissue incorporation, macrophage response and biomechanical strength were examined. Results: At 14 and 90 days, the ProGrip and Surgipro CA meshes showed good host tissue incorporation; however, the Adhesix implants presented poor integration, seroma formation and a higher degree of shrinkage. The Adhesix hydrogel was completely reabsorbed at 14 days, whereas ProGrip microhooks were observed at all study times. The macrophage response was higher in the ProGrip and Surgipro CA groups at 14 and 90 days, respectively, and decreased over time. At 90 days, the ProGrip implants showed the highest tensile strength values and the Adhesix implants showed the highest failure stretch. Conclusion: Meshes with mechanical microgrip self-fixation (ProGrip) show better biological and mechanical behavior than those with adhesive hydrogel (Adhesix) in a preclinical model of abdominal hernia repair in rabbits.