European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey

Objectives The aim of this study is to identify and analyse research priorities across the osteopathic profession internationally, to determine how different interested parties conceptualise research importance and to examine how contextual factors influence research prioritisation.Design A mixed me...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Vaucher, P, Carnes, D, Hohenschurz-Schmidt, D, Thomson, O, Vogel, S, Arienti, C, Bright, P, Bustins, GA, Esteves, J, Esteves, NK, Fawkes, C, Rinne, S, Roura, S, Treffel, L, Wagner, A, Draper-Rodi, J
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Recursos:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repositorio:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p20381
Acesso em linha:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=20381
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Physical Therapy Modalities
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Design
Health
Community Participation
id ES_2a53af95b1a5e2b022ae6ea5ebc4da9a
oai_identifier_str oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p20381
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and surveyVaucher, PCarnes, DHohenschurz-Schmidt, DThomson, OVogel, SArienti, CBright, PBustins, GAEsteves, JEsteves, NKFawkes, CRinne, SRoura, STreffel, LWagner, ADraper-Rodi, JPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesResearch DesignHealthCommunity ParticipationObjectives The aim of this study is to identify and analyse research priorities across the osteopathic profession internationally, to determine how different interested parties conceptualise research importance and to examine how contextual factors influence research prioritisation.Design A mixed methods sequential exploratory design combining an umbrella review, a thematic analysis, an expert consensus agreement and an international cross-sectional survey was used to define, validate and evaluate research priorities.Setting An international online survey, available in nine languages, was distributed through professional osteopathic organisations and network worldwide, a patient representative organisation and social media.Participants 2229 respondents including patients (7.4%), practitioners (42.1%), students (17.4%), educators (13.5%), researchers (5.0%) and policy makers (4.3%) from across 42 countries.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes were interested party's conceptualisation of research importance and validation of the priorities in Research for Osteopathic Care (PROCare) framework. Secondary outcomes included current research priorities across interested parties groups and influence of contextual factors on prioritisation.Results Three distinct approaches to priority-setting emerged: conservative (42.9%), sceptic (20.2%) and enthusiast (36.9%). Organising research priorities as a construct built from domains and subdomains was shown to be internally valid (Cronbach's alpha=0.911). 'Patient safety' (nominated by 82% of relevant countries) and 'physical activities and mobility' (51.0%) were the most prioritised subdomains. 'Digital health' ranked lowest (28th of 28 subdomains). Significant geographic variations were observed mainly for the overall importance to most research domains. Strong consensus emerged around core priorities including patient safety, physical activity promotion and understanding treatment mechanisms.Conclusions The PROCare framework provides a validated structure for evaluating osteopathic research priorities across diverse interested parties. While geographic variations exist in priority emphasis, fundamental agreement on key research domains suggests potential for internationally coordinated research strategies. Future work should focus on developing mechanisms to ensure balanced representation of conservative, sceptic and enthusiast perspectives in research planning.BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP2025info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=20381BMJ OpenISSN: 20446055reponame:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pauinstname:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p203812026-06-14T12:41:47Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
title European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
spellingShingle European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
Vaucher, P
Physical Therapy Modalities
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Design
Health
Community Participation
title_short European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
title_full European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
title_fullStr European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
title_full_unstemmed European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
title_sort European research Priorities for Osteopathic Care (PROCare): a sequential exploratory investigation and survey
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vaucher, P
Carnes, D
Hohenschurz-Schmidt, D
Thomson, O
Vogel, S
Arienti, C
Bright, P
Bustins, GA
Esteves, J
Esteves, NK
Fawkes, C
Rinne, S
Roura, S
Treffel, L
Wagner, A
Draper-Rodi, J
author Vaucher, P
author_facet Vaucher, P
Carnes, D
Hohenschurz-Schmidt, D
Thomson, O
Vogel, S
Arienti, C
Bright, P
Bustins, GA
Esteves, J
Esteves, NK
Fawkes, C
Rinne, S
Roura, S
Treffel, L
Wagner, A
Draper-Rodi, J
author_role author
author2 Carnes, D
Hohenschurz-Schmidt, D
Thomson, O
Vogel, S
Arienti, C
Bright, P
Bustins, GA
Esteves, J
Esteves, NK
Fawkes, C
Rinne, S
Roura, S
Treffel, L
Wagner, A
Draper-Rodi, J
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Physical Therapy Modalities
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Design
Health
Community Participation
topic Physical Therapy Modalities
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Design
Health
Community Participation
description Objectives The aim of this study is to identify and analyse research priorities across the osteopathic profession internationally, to determine how different interested parties conceptualise research importance and to examine how contextual factors influence research prioritisation.Design A mixed methods sequential exploratory design combining an umbrella review, a thematic analysis, an expert consensus agreement and an international cross-sectional survey was used to define, validate and evaluate research priorities.Setting An international online survey, available in nine languages, was distributed through professional osteopathic organisations and network worldwide, a patient representative organisation and social media.Participants 2229 respondents including patients (7.4%), practitioners (42.1%), students (17.4%), educators (13.5%), researchers (5.0%) and policy makers (4.3%) from across 42 countries.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcomes were interested party's conceptualisation of research importance and validation of the priorities in Research for Osteopathic Care (PROCare) framework. Secondary outcomes included current research priorities across interested parties groups and influence of contextual factors on prioritisation.Results Three distinct approaches to priority-setting emerged: conservative (42.9%), sceptic (20.2%) and enthusiast (36.9%). Organising research priorities as a construct built from domains and subdomains was shown to be internally valid (Cronbach's alpha=0.911). 'Patient safety' (nominated by 82% of relevant countries) and 'physical activities and mobility' (51.0%) were the most prioritised subdomains. 'Digital health' ranked lowest (28th of 28 subdomains). Significant geographic variations were observed mainly for the overall importance to most research domains. Strong consensus emerged around core priorities including patient safety, physical activity promotion and understanding treatment mechanisms.Conclusions The PROCare framework provides a validated structure for evaluating osteopathic research priorities across diverse interested parties. While geographic variations exist in priority emphasis, fundamental agreement on key research domains suggests potential for internationally coordinated research strategies. Future work should focus on developing mechanisms to ensure balanced representation of conservative, sceptic and enthusiast perspectives in research planning.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=20381
url https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=20381
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Open
ISSN: 20446055
reponame:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
instname:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
instname_str Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
reponame_str r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
collection r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869405061890703360
score 15,811543

Registos relacionados