Automating resolution is NP-Hard
We show that the problem of finding a Resolution refutation that is at most polynomially longer than a shortest one is NP-hard. In the parlance of proof complexity, Resolution is not automatable unless P = NP. Indeed, we show that it is NP-hard to distinguish between formulas that have Resolution re...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/337031 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/337031 https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3409472 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Computational complexity Resolution Proof search NP-hardness Complexitat computacional Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Informàtica teòrica |
| Sumario: | We show that the problem of finding a Resolution refutation that is at most polynomially longer than a shortest one is NP-hard. In the parlance of proof complexity, Resolution is not automatable unless P = NP. Indeed, we show that it is NP-hard to distinguish between formulas that have Resolution refutations of polynomial length and those that do not have subexponential length refutations. This also implies that Resolution is not automatable in subexponential time or quasi-polynomial time unless NP is included in SUBEXP or QP, respectively. |
|---|