Clinical practice guidelines with recommendations for peripartum depression: A European systematic review

Objective This study aims to systematically review all Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) with recommendations for peripartum depression in European countries. Methods A systematic review according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. CPGs focussing on peripartum depression or with at least one s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Motrico, Emma, Moreno Peral, Patricia, Uriko, Kristiina, Hancheva, Camellia, Brekalo, Maja, Ajaz, Erilda, Apter, Gisèle, Bramante, Alessandra, Conejo Cerón, Sonia, Christoforou, Andri, Dikmen Yildiz, Pelin, Evagorou, Olympia, Fonseca, Ana, Lupattelli, Angela, Nakić Radoš, Sandra, Maach, Nadia al, Rodríguez Muñoz, María de la Fe, Maja Žutić, Mijke P., Lambregtse van den Berg, Mijke P.
Format: article
Publication Date:2022
Country:España
Institution:Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia
Repository:e-spacio. Repositorio Institucional de la UNED
Language:English
OAI Identifier:oai:e-spacio.uned.es:20.500.14468/23657
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/23657
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:61 Psicología
clinical practice guidelines
depression
perinatal
peripartum
systematic review
Description
Summary:Objective This study aims to systematically review all Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) with recommendations for peripartum depression in European countries. Methods A systematic review according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. CPGs focussing on peripartum depression or with at least one specific recommendation for peripartum depression from European countries were selected. Searching was conducted in electronic databases (MEDLINE and PsycINFO), and by contacting professional societies and international experts until November 24th, 2021. Characteristics of the included CPGs and their recommendations were extracted. A methodological quality assessment was conducted using the AGREE-II tool. Results A total of 239 records were identified after duplicate removal. Of these, 54 were examined for full-text inspection. The final selection yielded 14 CPGs from 11 European countries in 10 languages. Of them, 11 provided recommendations on pharmacological treatments, 10 on psychological treatment (e.g., cognitive-behavioural therapy), 10 on screening, 8 on diagnosis, 6 on other treatments (e.g., physical exercise), 5 on prevention, and 5 other recommendations (e.g., provide information). Regarding the overall methodological quality, only five (35.7%) guidelines were rated as of adequate quality, reaching a score ≥ 70% in the overall assessment of the AGREE-II instrument. Of the six AGREE-II domains, applicability scored the lowest and clarity of presentation scored the highest. Conclusion The absence of CPGs in most European countries, the discrepancy in recommendations and the low methodological quality of the guidelines may lead to disparities and inequalities in peripartum depression management in Europe. The COST Action Riseup-PPD highlights key considerations for future guideline developers.