Testing alternative measures of subjective norms in entrepreneurial intention models

Although the theory of planned behaviour can be applied to entrepreneurship, study outcomes concerning the role of the subjective norm construct vary substantially. Using da ta from ten dissim ilar countries, two critical topics held res ponsible for conflicting outcomes in research on entrepreneuri...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Heuer, Annamária, Liñán, Francisco
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2013
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/70543
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/70543
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2013.054310
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Entrepreneurial intention
Theory of planned behaviour
TPB
Subjective norm
Measurement
Structural equation modelling
SEM
Intention models
Measures
Entrepreneurship
Descrição
Resumo:Although the theory of planned behaviour can be applied to entrepreneurship, study outcomes concerning the role of the subjective norm construct vary substantially. Using da ta from ten dissim ilar countries, two critical topics held res ponsible for conflicting outcomes in research on entrepreneurial intention are investigated: 1 measurement issues 2 possible indirect influences betw een the motivational antecedents of intention. On the first topic, structural equations suggest that a simple multi-item subjective-norm measure is better than the frequently-applied product of normative beliefs and motivation to comply. On the second, structural equation modelling reveals that the internal consis tency and explanatory capacity of the constructs is about the same with the original model than with a modified model taking into account the indirect influences of subjective norms on attitudes and on perceived behavioural c ontrol. These results should serve as a guide for future theoretical and empiri cal development, and put existing study outcomes into perspective.