New beam-based models for fire-induced buckling analysis of class 4 steel columns
[EN] Steel cross-sections with thin walls are vulnerable to fire-induced buckling instability, which reduces their load-bearing capacity. Eurocode 3 design provisions have been found inadequate, leading to alternative methods such as effective design strategies and advanced structural models built m...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/220271 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/220271 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Instability Fibre-type numerical models Flexural-torsional buckling Thin-walled steel members Class 4 steel cross-section Residual stresses Geometric imperfections Nonlinear mechanical analysis with imperfections Steel members under fire |
| Sumario: | [EN] Steel cross-sections with thin walls are vulnerable to fire-induced buckling instability, which reduces their load-bearing capacity. Eurocode 3 design provisions have been found inadequate, leading to alternative methods such as effective design strategies and advanced structural models built mostly with shell FE, which can be complex. For Class 4 steel beam-columns subjected to fire conditions, beam-type modelling to predict the Flexural-Torsional Buckling (FTB) strength has been proposed as an alternative approach, but it has not yielded satisfactory results for large compressive load eccentricities. This paper presents two new low computational cost modelling strategies based on Timoshenko's beam FE to address this issue: the Single beam-column Model (SbcM) and the Cruciform beam-column Model (CbcM). The first consists of a single line of beam FE, while the second uses a grid of beam FE for more flexibility. Both strategies effectively simulate the FTB behaviour in Class 4 steel beam-column during a fire, offering quicker computations compared to shell models. Still, the single-line model is favoured for its simplicity, making it more efficient in analysing complex fire engineering problems. |
|---|