Executive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorder patients and their unaffected siblings: a ten-year follow-up study
Executive dysfunction represents a core deficit that is associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). However, the longitudinal course of executive deficits in SSDs is still controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the executive performance of 34 SSD patients in relation to 34...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2013 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Pública de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Academica-e. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Pública de Navarra |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:academica-e.unavarra.es:2454/47229 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2454/47229 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Psychosis Schizophrenia spectrum disorders Executive function Siblings Longitudinal study |
| Sumario: | Executive dysfunction represents a core deficit that is associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). However, the longitudinal course of executive deficits in SSDs is still controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the executive performance of 34 SSD patients in relation to 34 of their unaffected siblings over a period of 10 years. Both groups completed psychopathological and executive assessments. Thirteen healthy controls were assessed using the same instruments. At baseline, the SSD patients differed significantly from siblings and controls in their performance on the Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B) and the number of categories in which they succeeded in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). They also differed significantly from the controls in the total number of errors in the WCST. The siblings did not differ in executive functioning from the controls over the follow-up. Longitudinally, the patients demonstrated significant improvement only for the TMT-B. However, only 14.71% of the patients showed reliable and clinically significant improvements for the TMT-B, and 8.82% made more errors on the WCST at the follow-up evaluation. Less than 3% of the patients showed either improved or worse results on the remaining measures of the WCST. A stabilisation pattern for the WCST was observed in the three groups. The patients performed worse than their siblings and controls on both executive tests. Some patients exhibited significant improvements in the TMT-B over time, but this improvement was reliable and clinically significant for less than 15% of the sample. Thus, we conclude that the patients exhibited stable impairments over time in the executive functions assessed. |
|---|