Learning outcomes and cost-utility analysis of hybrid patient and mannequin-based simulation
Introduction: There is no clear evidence on the relationship between nursing student learning outcomes and the type of simulator used or its cost-effectiveness.Objectives: Compare nursing student learning outcomes using either the hybrid patient or mannequin and the cost-utility of both simulators.M...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante (ISABIAL) |
| Repositorio: | r-ISABIAL. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica y Sanitaria de Alicante |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:isabial.fundanetsuite.com:p11026 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://isabial.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones11026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106003 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Hybrid patient Mannequin Nursing students simulation training/ economics |
| Sumario: | Introduction: There is no clear evidence on the relationship between nursing student learning outcomes and the type of simulator used or its cost-effectiveness.Objectives: Compare nursing student learning outcomes using either the hybrid patient or mannequin and the cost-utility of both simulators.Method: A randomised experimental study with an experimental group (hybrid patient = 99) and a control group (mannequin = 97). A training intervention was carried out for polytrauma patients.Results: Statistically significant differences were found between the simulator used and the performance results for tourniquet (hybrid 5.37 +/- 1.33, mannequin 4.95 +/- 1.09; p = .008) and spinal board (hybrid 6.18 +/- 2.02, mannequin 6.97 +/- 20.2; p = .001) application. The cost-utility ratio was estimated to be 3.29 for the hybrid patient and 1.92 for the mannequin. Conclusion: The use of a hybrid patient or mannequin has not been shown to be a determinant of performance outcomes or student perceptions in training interventions in polytrauma patient care. However, as the cost per participant with a mannequin is almost twice as high, the hybrid patient has a better cost-utility ratio. |
|---|