Bridging AI and medical expertise: ChatGPT's success on the medical specialization residency admission exam in Spain
The growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly focusing on the potential of generative AI models like ChatGPT-4 is a trending topic. The study examines how ChatGPT-4 performed on the national Medicine Residency exam in Spain, a highly selective test for accessing the med...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Pompeu Fabra |
| Repositorio: | Repositorio Digital de la UPF |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:rdupf_______::01ede4442349cbb48d629e93d817f953 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10230/72970 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI250544 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | ChatGPT Generative AI Health profession students Medical education |
| Sumario: | The growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly focusing on the potential of generative AI models like ChatGPT-4 is a trending topic. The study examines how ChatGPT-4 performed on the national Medicine Residency exam in Spain, a highly selective test for accessing the medical specialization training program called MIR. ChatGPT-4 answered 210 questions, including 25 that required image interpretation. The chatbot correctly answered 150 out of 200 questions, achieving an estimated ranking of around 1900-2300 out of 11,577 candidates. This performance would allow access to most medical specialties in Spain. No significant differences were found between questions requiring image analysis and those that did not, but ChatGPT struggled with more difficult questions, showing a higher error rate for complex problems just like a human being. Despite its potential as an educational and problem-solving tool, the study highlights ChatGPT's limitations, including occasional "AI hallucinations" (incorrect or nonsensical answers) and variability in responses when questions were repeated. The study emphasizes that while AI tools such as ChatGPT can assist in education and medical tasks, they cannot replace qualified healthcare professionals, and their output requires careful verification. |
|---|