Potential of e-Fischer Tropsch diesel and oxymethyl-ether (OMEx) as fuels for the dual-mode dual-fuel concept

[EN] The dual-mode dual-fuel combustion strategy allows operating over the entire engine map by implementing a diffusive dual-fuel combustion at high engine loads. This requires increasing the amount of exhaust gas re-circulation to control the NOx emissions, which penalizes the soot levels. At thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: García Martínez, Antonio|||0000-0001-5783-4936, Monsalve-Serrano, Javier|||0000-0001-8593-095X, Villalta-Lara, David, Lago-Sari, Rafael, Gordillo Zavaleta, Victor, Gaillard, Patrick
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repositorio:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/153686
Acceso en línea:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/153686
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Dual-fuel combustion
Emissions
Soot reduction
Oxygenated fuels
Synthetic fuels
MAQUINAS Y MOTORES TERMICOS
Descripción
Sumario:[EN] The dual-mode dual-fuel combustion strategy allows operating over the entire engine map by implementing a diffusive dual-fuel combustion at high engine loads. This requires increasing the amount of exhaust gas re-circulation to control the NOx emissions, which penalizes the soot levels. At these conditions, the use of nonsooting fuels as the e-Fischer Tropsch Diesel (e-FT) and oxymethylene dimethyl ethers (OMEx) could be a potential way to avoid the NOx-soot trade-off. The experimental results acquired in a compression ignition multi-cylinder medium-duty engine evidence that the higher oxygen content of OMEx allows reducing the soot emissions at high loads to near zero levels, while e-FT promotes a soot reduction of around 20% as compared to diesel. Nonetheless, the low lower heating value of OMEx leads to excessive injection durations, enlarging the combustion process and increasing the fuel consumption around 1.3-7.2% and 1.4-5.3% as compared to diesel and e-FT, respectively, depending on the engine load. Finally, the well to wheel analysis confirms the potential in reducing the carbon dioxide footprint of OMEx (14.8-69%) and e-FT (0.3-38.5%) compared to diesel, as they can be synthetized via direct air capture as a source of carbon and using renewable energy.